METAEVALUATION ACCREDITATION RESULTS OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING EDUCATION STUDY PROGRAM FACULTY OF ENGINEERING STATE UNIVERSITY OF JAKARTA 2010
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22236/jkpuhamka.v5i1.9238Keywords:
ACCREDITATION, PRIMARY EVALUATION, METAEVALUATION, PROGRAM EVALUTIONAbstract
The Study Program's accreditation process is very important to to maintain the continuity of education services quality and to provide assurance that the accredited Study Program has met the quality standards set by BAN-PT. This study aims to determine the percentage level of achievement in the meta-evaluation process, the higher percentage level achievement of the meta-evaluation results means that this research instrument can be used to measure the primary evaluation with a high level of achievement. This research is a evaluation research using metaevaluation approach, the subject in this study is the primary evaluation in the form of the accreditation results of Electrical Engineering Education Study Program, Faculty of Engineering, State University of Jakarta in 2010. The research instrument is a development of the BAN-PT accreditation assessment instrument which is guided by Book VI Assessment Matrix Instrument of Undergraduate Study Program Accreditation. Data and information collection's method by observations, documentations, group discussions and interviews. The results showed that the percentage of achievement level given by meta-evaluation calculation in average of 10 respondents was 84.59%. It can be concluded that the meta-evaluation instrument in this research can measure primary evaluations with a high percentage of achievement.
Downloads
References
Arikunto, S. 2009. Manajemen Penelitian. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Arikunto, S. 2010. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Azwar, S. 1986, Validitas dan Reliabilitas. Jakart: Rineka Cipta.
Badan Akreditasi Nasional Perguruan Tinggi. 2007. Akreditasi Institusi Perguruan Tinggi : Buku I Naskah Akademik Akreditasi Institusi Perguruan Tinggi. Jakarta: BAN-PT.
Badan Akreditasi Nasional Perguruan Tinggi. 2007. Akreditasi Institusi Perguruan Tinggi : Buku II Standar dan Prosedur Akreditasi Institusi Perguruan Tinggi. Jakarta: BAN-PT.
Badan Akreditasi Nasional Perguruan Tinggi. 2008. Akreditasi Program Studi Sarjana : Buku V Pedoman Penilaian Akreditasi Program Studi Sarjana. Jakarta: BAN-PT.
Badan Akreditasi Nasional Perguruan Tinggi. 2008. Akreditasi Program Studi Sarjana : Buku VI Matrik Penilaian Instrumen Akreditasi Program Studi Sarjana. Jakarta: BAN-PT.
Badriah, I. dan Setiadi, H. 2015. Evaluasi Program Layanan Pendidikan Berbasis ICT. Jakarta: Jurnal Penelitian dan Penilaian Pendidikan Vol. 1 No.1.
Blake, A.M. 2013. An Empirical Examination and Metaevaluation of The Impact Evaluation Process. Michigan. Wayne State University.
Enam Ribu (6000) Program Studi PT Belum Terakreditasi. 2012. Kompas. 19 Mei 2012: Hal 12.
Fakultas Teknik. 2007. Standar Mutu Pendidikan. Jakarta: Fakultas Teknik Universitas Negeri Jakarta.
Fakultas Teknik. 2012. Buku Panduan Akademik. Jakarta: Teknik Elektro Fakultas Teknik Universitas Negeri Jakarta.
Tayibnapis, F.Y. 2008. Evaluasi Program dan Instrumen Evaluasi untuk Program Pendidikan dan Penelitian. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Fraenkel, J.R. dan Wallen, N.E. 2009. How to design and evaluate research in education (7th ed.). New York. McGraw-Hill Companies.
Helder, H.C. & Gibram, N. 2009. The Contribution of Metaevaluation to Program Evaluation : Proposition of a Model. Brasilia. Journal of Multidisciplinary Evaluation Volume 6 Number 12.
Iskandar, F. 2012. Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Program Pendampingan Penyelenggaraan Pendidikan Kejuruan Direktorat SMK (Studi Kasus di Universitas Sebelas Maret). Jakarta: FISIP Universitas Indonesia.
National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education. 2001. Profesional Standar for Accreditation of Teacher Preparation Instutution. Washington: NCATE.
Nawawi, H.H. 1983. Metode Penelitian Deskriptif. Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University Press.
Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia No.19 Tahun 2005 Tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia.
Provus, M.M. 1969. The Discrepancy Evaluation Model : An Approach to Local Program Improvement and Development. Washington: U.S. Department of Health, Education & Welfare.
Universitas Negeri Jakarta. 2007. Portofolio Institusi. Jakarta: UNJ.
Program Studi Tidak Terakreditasi Segera Ditutup. 2009. Kompas. 24 Desember 2009: Hal 12.
Scriven, M.S., Stufflebeam, D.L., dan Madaus, G.F. 1983. Evaluation Models (Viewpoints on Educational and Human Services). Boston: Kluwer Nijholl Publishing.
Shanahan, K.A. 2014. Metaevaluation of a University Teacher Education Assessment System. Kentucky: University of Louisville.
Stufflebeam, D.L. & Shinkfield, A.J. 1985. Systematic Evaluation. Boston: Kluwer Nijhof Publishing.
Stufflebeam, D.L. 2007. CIPP Evaluation Model Checklist : A Tool for Applying the CIPP Model to assess long-term enterprises. Michigan: Western Michigan University.
Stufflebeam, D.L. 2011. Meta-Evaluation. Michigan: Western Michigan University.
Sugiyono. 2018. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sugiyono. 2010. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta.
The Western Association of School and Colleges. 2001. Handbook of Acreditation. California: WASC.
Tyler, R.W. 1950. Models of Teaching. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Soekamto, T. 2004. Evaluasi Program : Modul Kuliah. Jakarta: Universitas Negeri Jakarta.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 12 Tahun 2012 Tentang Pendidikan Tinggi. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 Tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2003.
Wirakartakusumah, M.A. 1998. Pengertian Mutu Dalam Pendidikan. Bogor: Lokakarya MMT IPB.
Wirawan. 2010. Evaluasi Program : Modul Kuliah. Jakarta: Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. Dr. Hamka.
Wirawan. 2011. Evaluasi : Teori, Model, Standar, Aplikasi dan Profesi. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
