THE EFFECT OF QUALITY SERVICES AND FACILITIES ON STUDENT SATISFACTION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22236/jkpuhamka.v2i2.4851Keywords:
Satisfaction, Facilities, Services, higher educationAbstract
In principle, prioritizing stakeholders' satisfaction is the philosophy of all educational institutions including Sekolah Tinggi Farmasi Muhammadiyah located in Tangerang Banten. Quality services in high education are services that can meet the needs of students and their expectations. Thus, this study aims to determine the effect of service quality (reliability, responsiveness, empathy, guarantee, direct evidence (physical evidence) on the satisfaction of students who use services and facilities. In addition, this study also aims to determine the most influential dimensions of service quality in providing satisfaction to students. The samples were 24 people from all population of 460 students, where the research data was collected through questionnaires. Validity instruments were tested using the construct validity test and reliability instruments were tested using the Cronbach Alpha. SPSS Statistics 24.00 was employed to analyze frequency statistics. Hypothesis results that have been tested on the frequency table are 95% internal evidence evidence (a-5%). The results of the study show that the dimensions of reliability, responsiveness, assurance, empathy, and tangible have a positive effect on student satisfaction.
Downloads
References
Asrukin, Mochammad (2001). Student Attitudes Towards IKIP Malang Library Facilities and Services. (Sikap Mahasiswa Terhadap Fasilitas Dan Pelayanan Perpustakan IKIP Malang). Unpublished Tesis, Universitas Indonesia.
Begnum, S. & StjerneÌ, S., (2000). `The use of student surveys in improving quality of education', in fahleaÌ‚ N,V., Liuhanen, A.M., Petersson, L. & Stensaker, B. (Eds.) Towards Best Practise: Quality improvement initiatives in Nordic higher education institutions. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers, TemaNord.
Gaell, V. (2000) `The expectations and experience of first-year students at City University of Hong Kong'. Quality in Higher Education, 6, pp. 77- 89.
Majeed, S. & Ziadat, M. (2008). Quality and Accreditation of public education institutions and university. Amman: Dar al - Safaa for publication and distribution.
Meiklejohn, R., horsburgh, M. & wright, C., (1997) The 1997 Report on the Student Experience at AIT. Auckland: Auckland Institute of Technology.
Mulanjari, S. (1999). Perception of use toward service quality (Persepsi Pemakaian Terhadap Kualitas Jasa Layanan). Unpublished Tesis, Universitas Indonesia
Parasuraman, Zeithhaml & Bery (1991). Delivering Service Quality. New York: Free Press.
Pascarella, E.T. & Terenzini, P.T., (1991). How College Affects Students: Findings and insights from twenty years of research. San Francisco: Jossey- Bass.
Qureshi, T., Shaukat, M., & Hijazi, S. (2011). Service Quality SERVQUAL model in Higher Educational Institutions, What Factors Are to be Considered. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business. Vol. 2, No. 5, 281-290.
Roesma, Lily Irawati (1991). The Role of Higher Education Libraries (Peranan Perpustakaan Perguruan Tinggi), dalam Makalah Lokakarya pengembangan Perpustakaan Perguruan Tinggi di Indonesia Barat.
Santoso, Singgih (2002). Buku Latihan SPSS Statistik Parametrik. Jakarta: Penerbit PT. Elex Media Komputindo.
Torper, U., 1997, Studentbarometerní Resultatredovisning [The Student Barometer Documentation of results. Lunds: Lunds Universitet, UtvaEÌ€ rderingsenheten
Wiers-Jenssen, J., Stensaker, B., & Gr⊘gaard, J. B. (2002). Student Satisfaction: Towards an empirical deconstruction of the concept. Quality in Higher Education, 8(2), 183–195. doi:10.1080/1353832022000004377
Zulganef. (2002). Discriminant Analysis of Factors that Differentiate Often Consumers Consume Services (Analiasis Diskriminan Terhadap Faktor-faktor yang Membedakan Sering Tidaknya Konsumen Mengkonsumsi Jasa). Manajemen usahawan Indonesia, 31 (3) Maret; 22”28.
