Main Article Content

Abstract

This research was conducted to determine whether there is influence of the Synchronous and Asynchronous approach methods on student learning outcomes. This research was conducted at SMAN 3 Tangerang. The population in this study were 310 students and 175 students were taken as a sample. This research is a quantitative research and uses a questionnaire in collecting data. The results of the questionnaire data were processed using the IMB SPSS Statistics application version 25. The results of this study indicate that there is a positive influence in online learning using the Synchronous and Asynchronous approach methods on student learning outcomes. Even though the magnitude of this influence, based on the results of the analysis the coefficient of Determination (R2) is relativaly low, namely 0.292 or 29.2 %.

Keywords

Synchronous Asynchronous Online learning Learning Outcomes

Article Details

How to Cite
Lastari, R., Lismawati, Heru Wibowo, & Totong Heri. (2023). Mixed Methods of Learning in Schools: Reshaping comprehensive education in Synchronous and Asynchronus. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 14(02), 74–79. https://doi.org/10.22236/jpi.v14i02.11710

References

  1. Abdullah, M. Y., Bakar, N. R. A., & Mahbob, M. H. (2012). The dynamics of student participation in classroom: observation on level and forms of participation. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, 61–70.
  2. Ainscow, M. (1995). Education for all: making it happen. Support for Learning, 10(4), 147–155.
  3. Andiani, D., Hajizah, M. N., & Dahlan, J. A. (2021). Analisis rancangan assesmen kompetensi minimum (akm) numerasi program merdeka belajar. Majamath: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1), 80–90.
  4. Fahmi, S. F. S. F. S. (2023). Merdeka Belajar-Kampus Merdeka. At-Tadris: Journal of Islamic Education, 2(2), 92–97.
  5. Fuad, A. F. N. (2022). Agama, Spiritualitas, dan Kesalehan pada Masa Pandemi. In Faith & Pandemic: Religious Narrative and Covid-19 Survival (1st ed., pp. 40–44). Yayasan Literasi Naratif Islami.
  6. Hadi, B. (2015). Pengembangan ICT dalam Pembelajaran Pengembangan ICT dalam Pembelajaran. Pengembangan ICT Dalam Pembelajaran, November, 36–44.
  7. Jojor, A., & Sihotang, H. (2022). Analisis Kurikulum Merdeka dalam Mengatasi Learning Loss di Masa Pandemi Covid-19 (Analisis Studi Kasus Kebijakan Pendidikan). Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 4(4), 5150–5161.
  8. Lismawati, L., Astutik, A. P., Ramadhan, A. R., & Rahmanto, M. A. (2023). Deconstruction of AKM Literacy in PAI Lessons on the Learning Performance of MBKM Students. Halaqa: Islamic Education Journal, 7(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.21070/halaqa.v7i1.1634
  9. Lombardi, D., Shipley, T. F., Bailey, J. M., Bretones, P. S., Prather, E. E., Ballen, C. J., Knight, J. K., Smith, M. K., Stowe, R. L., Cooper, M. M., Prince, M., Atit, K., Uttal, D. H., LaDue, N. D., McNeal, P. M., Ryker, K., St. John, K., van der Hoeven Kraft, K. J., & Docktor, J. L. (2021). The Curious Construct of Active Learning. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100620973974
  10. Marbouti, F., Shafaat, A., Ulas, J., & Diefes-Dux, H. A. (2018). Relationship between time of class and student grades in an active learning course. Journal of Engineering Education, 107(3), 468–490.
  11. Martens, S. E., Meeuwissen, S. N. E., Dolmans, D. H. J. M., Bovill, C., & Könings, K. D. (2019). Student participation in the design of learning and teaching: Disentangling the terminology and approaches. Medical Teacher, 41(10), 1203–1205.
  12. Pulungan, S. (2017). Pemanfaatan ICT dalam pembelajaran PAI QUERY : jurnal sistem informasi. Sistem Informasi, 5341(April), 19–24.
  13. Ramadhan, A. R., & Lismawati. (2022). Prophetic Approach dalam Kebijakan Pendidikan Indonesia : Studi Analisis Teori Sosial Profetik Kuntowijoyo. 13(2), 89–96.
  14. Salsabila, U. H., Sari, L. I., Lathif, K. H., Lestari, A. P., & Ayuning, A. (2020). Peran Teknologi Dalam Pembelajaran Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Al-Mutharahah: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Kajian Sosial Keagamaan, 17(2), 188–198. https://doi.org/10.46781/al-mutharahah.v17i2.138
  15. Sari, E., & Noor, A. F. (2022). Kebijakan Pembelajaran Yang Merdeka: Dukungan Dan Kritik. Educativo: Jurnal Pendidikan, 1(1), 45–53.
  16. Smith, K. (2005). Teacher educators’ expertise: What do novice teachers and teacher educators say? Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(2), 177–192.
  17. Sopiansyah, D., Masruroh, S., Zaqiah, Q. Y., & Erihadiana, M. (2022). Konsep dan Implementasi Kurikulum MBKM (Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka). Reslaj: Religion Education Social Laa Roiba Journal, 4(1), 34–41.
  18. Susilawati, N. (2021). Merdeka Belajar dan Kampus Merdeka Dalam Pandangan Filsafat Pendidikan Humanisme. Jurnal Sikola: Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 2(3), 203–219.
  19. Wahjusaputri, S., Rahmanto, M. A., Suciani, & Azizah, S. K. S. (2023). Program SMK Pusat keunggulan (Center of Excellence) Pada Pendidikan Menengah Vokasi (1st ed.). Bintang Semesta Media.
  20. Wahyuningsih, K. S. (2021). Problematika pembelajaran daring di masa pandemi covid-19 di SMA Dharma Praja Denpasar. Pangkaja: Jurnal Agama Hindu, 24(1), 107–118.
  21. Wibowo dkk, H. (2023). Swastamita (1st ed.). Haura Utama.
  22. Zeghal, M. (2007). The ‘recentering’of religious knowledge and discourse: The case of al-Azhar in twentieth-century Egypt. Schooling Islam: The Culture and Politics of Modern Muslim Education, 107–130.