![](/public/site/images/uppi/make_submisio.png)
Publishing an article in a peer-reviewed REB is essential in developing a coherent and respected knowledge network. It directly reflects the quality of the authors' work and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. This journal follows guidelines from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) facing all aspects of publication ethics, mainly how to handle research and publication misconduct cases. For information detail about COPE, please click here.
This statement clarifies the ethical behavior of all parties involved in publishing an article in this journal, including the author, the Editor-in-Chief, the Editorial Board, the peer-reviewer, and the publisher. Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. Dr. Hamka as the publisher of REB, takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing seriously, and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint, or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions.
The editor of the REB is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement, and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.
Conflict of Interest must be stated clearly (during submission) to make sure that you have accurate information on potential interests. A declared conflict of interest will not automatically result in the rejection of a paper but the editors reserve the right to publish any declared conflict of interest alongside the acceptance.
The Editors of REB make every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the Content) in its publications. However, the Editors of REB make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of any purpose of the Content and disclaim all such representations and warranties, whether express or implied, to the maximum extent permitted by law. Any views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and are not necessarily those of the Editors of REB.
Authors reporting the experimental studies on human subjects must include a statement of assurance in the Materials and Methods section of the manuscript that:
Every experimental or clinical study may raise controversial ethical issues (e.g., Institutional Ethical Approval to study animal or human subjects). Thus, the journal editorial board expects all authors, reviewers, and editors to consider the COPE and Equator Network reporting guidelines in medical ethics plus scientific writing. If any, authors should state related declaration(s); otherwise, the following sentence should be given: None be declared.
The author(s) must get ethical permission from their institute to publish an article in a research journal. With this permission, the authors will agree upon standard ethical behavior.
Before starting a research project involving human participants or personal data, you must apply for ethical approval from one of the University's research ethics committees. The information you asked for by your local committee will depend on your discipline and the type of research that you intend to do.
The below table describes the requirement for approval codes in different types of manuscripts.
Manuscript Type | Ethical Approval Code |
---|---|
Research Articles | |
|
required* |
|
required * |
|
optional ** |
|
optional |
Systematic Review/Meta-Analysis/Scoping Review | non |
Please read also:
Editorial Board
Pendidikan Biologi - UHAMKA
Jl. Tanah Merdeka, Ps. Rebo
Jakarta, Indonesia