Article Sidebar

Submitted
October 25, 2022
Accepted
January 31, 2023
Published
January 31, 2023
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 232 Download : 189

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Discourse analysis is one of the methods of conducting research in social sciences, especially communication science. This paper describes approaches to conducting discourse analysis. The author collects data by conducting a literature review of publications or works of scholars in the field of discourse studies, especially Dijk, Halliday, and Fairclough. The author describes six approaches: The disposition Analysis Approach, Sociocognitive Approach, Discourse-History Approach, Dialectic-Relational Approach, Language Corpus Approach, and Social Actor Approach. Uses of Critical Discourse Analysis. The discourse analysis approach dismantles the practice of power in communication activities through the media. We illustrates that there are challenges for researchers and scholars related to the presence of new technologies, whether the presence of these new media provides an opportunity to create a counter-discourse or a small narrative or not. The new communication media provides breadth for the audience to produce many channels in producing and distributing discourse so that certain groups do not dominate the discourse. Traditional media has so far created a dominant discourse because of the accessibility of the media to the media structure so that the discourse supports the interests of the media. The presence of digital communication platforms enables small narratives, facilitating a culture of participation in media content

Keywords

Wacana, Analisis Wacana, Pendekatan Wacana

Article Details

How to Cite
Karman, K. (2023). Discourse Analysis Approach and Its Use In The Investigation Of Social Injustice in Text Representation. KOMUNIKA, 10(1), 72–79. https://doi.org/10.22236/komunika.v10i1.10178
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Alawadh, H. M. (2014). The Evolution Of Saudi Print Media Discourse On The U.S. after 9/11: A CDA of Al-Jazirah And Asharq Alawsat Newspapers. The University of Florida.
  2. Baker, P. (2006). Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. Continuum, 2006. In Applied Linguistics (p. 327). Continuum International Publishing Group.
  3. Baker, P., & Ellece, S. (2011). Key Terms in Discourse Analysis. Continuum International Publishing Group.
  4. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Handbook of Qualitative Research. SAGE Publication Inc.
  5. Doherty, R. J. (2015). The Alienation of humans from nature: Media and environmental discourse. University of Illinois.
  6. Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and Power. In Language in social life series. https://doi.org/10.2307/329335
  7. Fairclough, N. (1993). Critical Discourse Analysis and the Marketization of Public Discourse. Discourse & Society, 4(2), 133–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002002
  8. Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis. Longman.
  9. Fairclough, N. (2001). The Dialectics of Discourse. Textus, 14(2), 231–242. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500019539
  10. Fairclough, N. (2006). Semiosis, ideology and mediation: A dialectical view. In I. Lassen, J. Strunck, & T. Vestergaard (Eds.), Mediating Ideology in Text and Image: Ten critical studies (pp. 32–48). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
  11. Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis and critical policy studies. Critical Policy Studies, 7(2), 177–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2013.798239
  12. Fairclough, N., & Wodak, R. (1997). Critical discourse analysis. In T. A. VanDijk (Ed.), Discourse as Social Interaction: Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction, vol. 2 (1st ed., pp. 258– 84). SAGE Publication Inc.
  13. Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. Tavistock.
  14. Gee, J. P. (2011). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method (3rd ed.). Routledge.
  15. Gee, J. P. (2015). Discourse, small-d, Big D. http://jamespaulgee.com/pdfs/Big D, Small d.pdf
  16. Hamad, I. (2004). Konstruksi Realitas Politik: Sebuah Studi Critical Discourse Analysis terhadap Berita-berita Politik (1st ed.). Granit.
  17. Jäger, S. (2001). Discourse and knowledge: theoretical and methodological aspects of a critical discourse and dispositive analysis. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (1st ed.). SAGE Publication Inc.
  18. Leeuwen, T. V. (1996). The representation of social actors. In C. R. Caldas-Coulthard & M. Coulthard (Eds.), Texts and practices: Readings in critical discourse analysis (1st ed., pp. 32–70). Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
  19. Leeuwen, Theo. V. (2008). Discourse and practice: new tools for critical discourse analysis. Oxford University Press, Inc.
  20. Lihua, L. (2010). Discourse and Power by Teun A. van Dijk. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 14(2), 283–284. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2010.00443_6.x
  21. Locke, T. (2004). Critical Discourse Analysis. Continuum International Publishing Group.
  22. McEnery, T., & Wilson, A. (1996). Corpus linguistics: An Introduction. Edinburgh University Press.
  23. Pecheux, M. (1994). The Mechanism of Ideological (Mis)recognition. In S. Zizek (Ed.), Mapping Ideology (1st ed.). Verso.
  24. Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. (2009). The discourse-historical approach (DHA). In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (2nd ed., pp. 95–129). SAGE Publication Inc.
  25. Van Dijk, T. A. (1988). News as Discourse. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  26. Van Dijk, T. A. (1990). Social cognition and discourse. Handbook of Language and Social Psychology, 163.
  27. Van Dijk, T. A. (1993a). Elite Discourse and Racism. SAGE Publication Inc.
  28. Van Dijk, T. A. (1993b). Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis. Discourse & Society, 4(2), 249–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002006
  29. Van Dijk, T. A. (1995). Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis. Japenese Discourse, 1(1), 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002006
  30. Van Dijk, T. A. (1996). Discourse, power and access. In Caldas-Coulthard CR and Coulthard (Ed.), Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis. (pp. 84–104). Routledge.
  31. Van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Sage Publication Ltd.
  32. Van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Ideology and discourse analysis. Journal of Political Ideologies, 11(2), 115–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569310600687908
  33. Van Dijk, T. A. (2008). Discourse and Context: A sociocognitive approach. In Middle East (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511481499
  34. Van Dijk, T. A. (2012). Discourse and Knowledge. Handbook of Discourse Analysis, 587–603. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203809068.ch41
  35. van Dijk, T. A. T. T. A. (1993). Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis. Discourse & Society, 4(2), 249–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002006
  36. Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2009). Methods for Critical Discourse Analysis (2nd ed.). Sage Publication Ltd.