The Comparison of The Phonological Features of Sikka Language and English

  • Darmawan Darmawan IKIP Muhammadiyah Maumere
  • Gunawan Suryoputro Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. DR. Hamka

Abstract

The paper is aimed to find out: (1) the similarities and the differences of segmental features of Sikka language and English, and (2) the appropriate way to solve the problem of phonological teaching in Maumere. The data was collected from EFL participants who were their mother tongue are Sikka language, one of local languages in Maumere East Nusatenggara Island, Indonesia. To collect the data, theAural Phoneme Discrimination test, the Phoneme Recognition tes, andReading test were used. The findings revealed that errors were largely limited to final stops and sibilants, initial and final affricates, and interdentals. The error data did not completely accord with previous findings. A language transfer viewpoint offers an explanation as to why these particular sounds were found difficult for the participants. Patterns in the error data showed that stops were mostly devoiced, and these processes were developmental. The affricates and interdentals were frequently generalized to a stop or sibilant found in the first language. Overgeneralization of these articulatory difficult sounds is a common developmental process. Both transfer and developmental factors and their interaction explain much of the error data, though other factors such as hypercorrection and spelling interference also seem to play a role. An implication of the study is that these systematic, specific errors, dependent on first language, should be taken into account when teaching pronunciation to English learners from these local language groups.
 
Keywords: Contrastive analysis, phonetic features,  Sikka language

References

Asian Language Notes. No.3. (1983) Canberra. Australian Government Publications Service. Asian languages notes some likely areas of difficulty for Asian learners of English. No.3. Jndonesian; •Malay. 2nd edition. Canberra: AGPS.

Dardjowidjojo, E. (1978). Sentence patterns of Indonesian. The university press of Hawaii.

Ellis, R. (1994). Input and interaction and second language acquisition: The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hadi, F. (2015). An analysis of ESL students’ segmental phonemes in pronunciation class. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan, 1(1), 47-56.

Keating, D. (2013) Common English language problems of Indonesian participants. Retrieved November 17, 2013 from www.article-base.com.

Ladefoged, P. (2011). A course in phonetics (6th Ed). Boston, MA: Wadsworth/Cengage Learning.

Ladefoged, P. (2001) Vowels and consonants: An introduction to the sounds of languages. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers

Riswanto & Haryanto, E. (2012). Improving participants’ pronunciation through communicative drilling technique at Senior High School (SMA) 07 South Bengkulu, Indonesia. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(21), 82-87.

Wheelock, A. (2016). Phonological difficulties encountered by Italian learners of English: An error analysis. Hawaii Pacific University TESOL Working Paper Series 14, 41-61.

Weda, S. (2012). Stress shifts of English utterances made by Indonesian speakers of English (ISE). Canada: Canadian Center of Science and Education.

Whitman, R. L. (1970). Contrastive analysis: Problems and procedures. Language Learning, 20(2), 191-197.
Published
2019-02-28
How to Cite
DARMAWAN, Darmawan; SURYOPUTRO, Gunawan. The Comparison of The Phonological Features of Sikka Language and English. Journal of ELT Research, [S.l.], p. 64-72, feb. 2019. ISSN 2527-7448. Available at: <https://journal.uhamka.ac.id/index.php/jer/article/view/1959>. Date accessed: 19 may 2019.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.