Main Article Content

Abstract

Grading is a complicated process yet serves many significant roles such as judging students' achievement and providing parental feedback. However, studies suggest that grading practices are not always uniform in that non-achievement factors are also frequently included in determining grades. Thus it is important to review and further understand teachers' grading practices. This article explores the discussion and debates around grading practices both in the general education field as well as studies in the English as a foreign language (EFL) context. The discussion, in particular, focuses on the range of factors that influence teachers' grading practices. Finally, this article reflects on implications of grading practices and offers suggestions that have been commonly recommended by experts. 

Article Details

How to Cite
Zulaiha, S. (2017). Teachers’ Grading Practices: In Search for Clear Grading Criteria. Journal of ELT Research: The Academic Journal of Studies in English Language Teaching and Learning, 2(1), 15-23. Retrieved from https://journal.uhamka.ac.id/index.php/jer/article/view/157

References

  1. Brookhart, S. M. (1993). Teachers’ grading practices: Meaning and values. Journal of Educational Measurement, 30(2), 123–142.
  2. Brookhart, S. M. (1994). Teachers’ grading: Practice and theory. Applied Measurement in Education, 7(4), 279–301.
  3. Brookhart, S. M. (2004). Grading. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson-Merrill-Prentice Hall.
  4. Brookhart, S. M., Guskey, T. R., Bowers, A. J., Mcmillan, J. H., Smith, J. K., Smith, L. F., … Welsh, M. E. (2016). A century of grading research : Meaning and value in the most common educational measure, 86(4), 803–848.
  5. Brown, H. D. (2004). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices. White Plains, NY: Pearson Education.
  6. Cheng, L., & Sun, Y. (2015). Teachers’ grading decision making: Multiple influencing factors and methods. Language Assessment Quarterly, 12(12), 213–233.
  7. Cheng, L., & Wang, X. (2007). Grading, feedback, and reporting in ESL/EFL classrooms. Language Assessment Quarterly, 4(1), 85–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434300701348409
  8. Czekanski, K. E., & Wolf, Z. R. (2013). Encouraging and evaluating class participation. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 10(1), 1–10. Retrieved from http://eds.a.ebscohost.com/eds/detail/detail?sid=5e5b9762-5c31-4e67-ae98-07856c6880cb@sessionmgr4003&vid=0&hid=4111&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmUmc2NvcGU9c2l0ZQ==#AN=EJ1005280&db=eric
  9. Friedman, S. J., & Frisbie, D. A. (2000). Making report cards measure up. Education Digest, 65(5), 45–50.
  10. Frisbie, D. A., & Waltman, K. K. (1992). Developing a personal grading plan. Educational Measurement : Issues and Practice, 11, 35–42.
  11. Gronlund, N. E. (1998). Assessment of student achievement. Boston: Allyn and Bacon Huba.
  12. Guskey, T. R. (1987). Rethinking mastery learning considered. Review of Educational Research, 57, 225–229.
  13. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.
  14. Hay, P. J., & Macdonald, D. (2008). Mis)appropriations of criteria and standards- referenced assessment in a performance-based subject. Assessment in Education, 15, 153–168.
  15. Kain, D. L. (1996). Looking beneath the surface: Teacher collaboration through the lens of grading practices. Teachers College Record, 94(4), 569–587.
  16. Linn, R., & Miller, M. (2005). Measurement and assessment in teaching. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
  17. Liu, X. (2013). Investigating factors influencing grading decisions among teachers of chinese to speakers of other languages.
  18. McMillan, J. H. (2001). Secondary teachers’ classroom assessment and grading practices. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 20(1), 20–32.
  19. McMillan, J. H. (2003). Understanding and improving teachers’ classroom assessment decision making: Implications for theory and practice. Measurement: Issues and Practice, 22(4), 34–43.
  20. McMillan, J. H. (2008). Assessment essentials for standards-based education (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  21. McMillan, J. H., & Lawson, S. R. (2001). Secondary science teachers’ classroom assessment and grading practices. Retrieved from Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED 450 158)
  22. McMillan, J. H., Myran, S., & Workman, D. (2002). Elementary teachers’ classroom assessment and grading practices. The Journal of Educational Research, 95(4), 203–213.
  23. Randall, J., & Engelhard, G. (2009). Differences between Teachers’ Grading Practices in Elementary and Middle Schools. Journal of Educational Research, 102(3), 175–185.
  24. Randall, J., & Engelhard, G. (2010). Examining the grading practices of teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(7), 1372–1380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.03.008
  25. Stiggins, R. J. (1998). Revitalizing classroom assessment: The highest instructional priority. Phi Delta Kappan, 68, 363–368.
  26. Sun, Y., & Cheng, L. (2013). Teachers’ grading practices: meaning and values assigned. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 30(March 2013), 1–18.
  27. Tierney, R. D. (2015). Altered grades : A grey zone in the ethics of classroom assessment, (5), 5–30. Retrieved from http://www.nzcer.org.nz/system/files/AM2015_8_005.pdf
  28. Wormeli, R. (2006). Accountability: Teaching through assessment and feedback, not grading. American Secondary Education, 34(3), 14–28.
  29. Yesbeck, D. M. (2011). Grading Practices: Teachers’ considerations of academic and non- academic factors. Grading Practices: Teachers’ Considerations of Academic and Nin Academic Factors, (December). Retrieved from http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search&q=intitle:No+Title#0
  30. Zoeckler, L. (2007). Moral aspects of grading: A study of high school English teachers’ perceptions. American Secondary Education, 35(2), 83–102.