Main Article Content

Abstract

Background: Pekon Biha Pesisir Barat is one of the villages directly adjacent to a body of sea water. This is a concern if it is not balanced with supporting information about the importance of mangrove habitat for rehabilitation. There is very little understanding of mangroves in this area. It can be seen from the people who carry out large-scale land conversion. This PKM aims to introduce the benefits of mangroves in a module with the BIOMA (Basic Information of Mangrove) concept as an effort to prevent disaster risk at SDN 1 Biha, Pekon Biha, Pesisir Barat Lampung. Methods: BIOMA is arranged based on tiered material that stimulates the sense of sight. The Village Partner is Pekon Biha, West Coast of Lampung. The method is carried out by teaching mangrove modules and interactive videos and evaluation through pre and post-test. Result: BIOMA mangrove education media received very high attention from elementary students, there was an increase in knowledge of 36% (very good). The pre-test showed that knowledge about mangroves in the good category was only 13%, after the provision of educational media, there were 76% of students who had very good knowledge about mangroves. The novelty of this PKM is creating interactive modules with live demonstrations with storylines that are close to the community. Conclusion: This media is effective in providing information related to mangroves.

Keywords

BIOMA Mangrove Natural Vegetation BIOMA Mangrove Vegetasi Alami

Article Details

How to Cite
Nabilah, R., Rian Adetiya Pratwi, Septi Maulidyah, & Martin Muljana. (2022). Bioma (Basic Information of Mangrove) sebagai Media Edukasi Pentingnya Tanggap Bencana dengan Vegetasi sebagai Pembatas Alami di Pekon Biha Pesisir Barat Lampung . Jurnal SOLMA, 11(2), 328–336. https://doi.org/10.22236/solma.v11i2.7359

References

  1. Alatorre, L. C., Sánchez-Carrillo, S., Miramontes-Beltrán, S., Medina, R. J., Torres-Olave, M. E., Bravo, L. C. Uc, M. (2016). Temporal changes of NDVI for qualitative environmental assessment of mangroves: Shrimp farming impact on the health decline of the arid mangroves in the Gulf of California (1990–2010). Journal of Arid Environments, 125, 98-109. doi:10.1016/j.jaridenv.2015.10.010
  2. Dahuri, R., J. Rais, S. P. Ginting, dan M. J. Sitepu, 1996. Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Wilayah Pesisir dan Lautan Secara Terpadu (Integrated Coastal and Ocean Management). PT. Pradnya Paramita, Jakarta. 305p.
  3. Davies, J. & G. Claridge. (1993). Wetland Benefits. The Potential for Wetlands toSupport and Maintain Development. Asian Wetland Bureau, InternationalWaterfowl & Wetlands Research Bureau, Wetlands for the America’s, 45 hal.
  4. Duke, N. C., Kovacs, J. M., Griffiths, A. D., Preece, L., Hill, D. J. E., van Oosterzee, P., Mackenzie, J., Morning, H. S., & Burrows, D. (2017). Large-scale dieback of mangroves in Australia’s Gulf of Carpentaria: a severe ecosystem response, coincidental with an unusually extreme weather event. Marine and Freshwater Research, 68(10), 1816–1829. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF16322.
  5. Hilmi, E. (2018). Mangrove landscaping using the modulus of elasticity and rupture properties to reduce coastal disaster risk. Ocean & Coastal Management, 165, 71-79. doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.08.002
  6. Kartawinata, K., S. Adisoemarto, S. Soemodihardjo, dan I.G.K. Tantra. (1978). Status Pengetahuan Hutan Bakau Di Indonesia. Prosiding Seminar Ekosistem Hutan Mangrove di Jakarta: MAB Indonesia dan Lembaga Oseanologi Nasional.
  7. Li, W., El-Askary, H., Qurban, M. A., Li, J., ManiKandan, K., & Piechota, T. (2019). Using multi-indices approach to quantify mangrove changes over the western Arabian Gulf along Saudi Arabia coast. Ecological Indicators, 102, 734-745. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.03.047
  8. Lionberger dan Paul Gwin. (1982). Communication strategies. Illinois. the interstate printers and publisher.
  9. Noor, Y. R., M. Khazali, dan I. N. N. Suryadiputra, (2006). Panduan Pengenalan Mangrove di Indonesia. Wetlands International, Indonesia Programme, Jakarta. Hal: 1- 9.
  10. Pimple, U., Simonetti, D., Hinks, I., Oszwald, J., Berger, U., & Pungkul, S. et al. (2020). A history of the rehabilitation of mangroves and an assessment of their diversity and structure using Landsat annual composites (1987–2019) and transect plot inventories. Forest Ecology And Management, 462, 118007. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118007
  11. Rhyma, P., Norizah, K., Hamdan, O., Faridah-Hanum, I., & Zulfa, A. (2020). Integration of normalised different vegetation index and Soil-Adjusted Vegetation Index for mangrove vegetation delineation. Remote Sensing Applications: Society And Environment, 17, 100280. doi: 10.1016/j.rsase.2019.100280
  12. Spalding, M., & Parrett, C. (2019). Global patterns in mangrove recreation and tourism. Marine Policy, 110, 103540. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2019.103540
  13. S.M. Hamylton a, , N. Nurdin, R.C. Carvalho, J.J. Jompa , Muhammad Akbar AS , M. Nur Fitrah b , Mahatma Lanuru d , Khairul Amri d. (2020). Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science. Mangrove and sand cay dynamics on Australian and Indonesian low wooded islands: A 45 year comparison of changes from remote sensing. Volume 245.
  14. Sreelekshmi, S., Nandan, S., Kaimal, S., Radhakrishnan, C., & Suresh, V. (2020). Mangrove species diversity, stand structure and zonation pattern in relation to environmental factors — A case study at Sundarban delta, east coast of India. Regional Studies In Marine Science, 35, 101111. doi: 10.1016/j.rsma.2020.101111
  15. Tomlinson, P.B. (1986). The Botany of Mangroves. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press