Article Sidebar

Submitted
2 August 2024
Accepted
4 October 2024
Published
31 December 2024
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 9 Download : 7

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Background: Keterlibatan aktif dalam pembelajaran mencakup eksplorasi konsep, dengan memastikan kontekstualisasi melalui isu-isu dan keunggulan lokal. Namun, saat ini isu lokal sering hanya digunakan sebagai apersepsi di awal pembelajaran, dan guru terkendala dalam implementasinya. Oleh karena itu, dilakukan pendampingan inovasi pembelajaran STEM pada guru SMA Muhammadiyah 3 Batu. Metode: FGD dan Workshop, Pengambilan data menggunakan survey. Hasil: Aktivitas pengabdian ini menghasilkan empat model taman vertikal dengan memenuhi tiga kriteria yaitu kemenarikan dan fungsionalitas desain, kemudahan perawatan, dan estetika komposisi tanaman. Kesimpulan: Aktivitas pendampingan ini dapat memberi pengalaman nyata bagi guru dalam menginovasi desain pembelajaran berdasarkan permasalahan kontekstual di sekitar siswa.

Keywords

Learning innovation 21st century learning STEM Inovasi pembelajaran Pembelajaran abad 21 STEM

Article Details

License
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

© 2022 Oleh authors. Lisensi Jurnal Solma, LPPM-Uhamka, Jakarta. Artikel ini bersifat open access yang didistribusikan di bawah syarat dan ketentuan Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

How to Cite
Miharja, F. J., Nuryady, M. M., Putri, A. F. A., & Agustina, J. A. (2024). Pendampingan Guru dalam Merancang Pembelajaran Inovatif Berbasis Keunggulan Lokal Melalui Kegiatan Praktikum STEM . Jurnal SOLMA, 13(3), 2906–2917. https://doi.org/10.22236/solma.v13i3.15885
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Albantani, A. M., & Madkur, A. (2018). Think Globally, Act Locally: The strategy of incorporating local wisdom in foreign language teaching in Indonesia. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 2015. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.7n.2p.1
  2. Alfaatihah, M. S., Permanasari, M. D., Sudrajat, A. G., Kurniatillah, A., Shavira, M. H., & Afiff, D. K. (2022). Modular vertical garden sebagai solusi praktis urban gardening Institut Teknologi Nasional. Rekayasa Hijau: Jurnal Teknologi Ramah Lingkungan, 5(3), 207–217. https://doi.org/10.26760/jrh.v5i3.207-217
  3. Andri, B. K., & Tumbuan, W. J. F. A. (2015). Potensi pengembangan agribisnis bunga anggrek di Kota Batu Jawa Timur. Jurnal LPPM Bidang EkoSosBudKum, 2(1), 19–30.
  4. Ardan, A. S. (2016). The development of biology teaching material based on the local wisdom of Timorese to improve students knowledge and attitude of environment in caring the preservation of environment. International Journal of Higher Education, 5(3), 190–200. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v5n3p190
  5. Ariza, M. R., Armenteros, A. Q., & Castro, A. E. (2024). Promoting critical thinking through mathematics and science teacher education: the case of argumentation and graphs interpretation about climate change. European Journal of Teacher Education, 47(1), 41–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2021.1961736
  6. Atuhurra, J., Kim-Hines, Y., & Nishimura, M. (2023). How did local wisdom and practice make schools thrive during the pandemic? Evidence from a positive deviance study in rural Uganda. Journal of International Cooperation in Education, 25(2), 171–187. https://doi.org/10.1108/jice-01-2023-0004
  7. Bahri, A., Idris, I. S., Muis, H., Arifuddin, M., & Fikri, M. J. N. (2020). Blended learning integrated with innovative learning strategy to improve self-regulated learning. International Journal of Instruction, 14(1), 779–794. https://doi.org/10.29333/IJI.2021.14147A
  8. Baur, A., & Emden, M. (2020). How to open inquiry teaching? An alternative teaching scaffold to foster students’ inquiry skills. Chemistry Teacher International, 3(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1515/cti-2019-0013
  9. Belecina, R. R., & Ocampo, J. M. (2018). Effecting change on students’ critical thinking in problem solving. EDUCARE: International Journal for Educational Studies International Journal for Educational Studies Article Timeline: Accepted, 10(102), 109–118. https://doi.org/10.2121/edu-ijes.v10i2.949
  10. Bensley, D. A., & Spero, R. A. (2014). Improving critical thinking skills and metacognitive monitoring through direct infusion. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 12, 55–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2014.02.001
  11. Chauveron, L. M., & Perkins, D. F. (2009). Prevention in context: Classroom heterogeneity as a moderator of PATHS’ effectiveness. Journal of Children’s Services, 4(1), 44–59. https://doi.org/10.1108/17466660200900005
  12. Choy, S. C., & Cheah, P. K. (2009). Teacher perceptions of critical thinking among students and its influence on higher education. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 20(2), 198–206.
  13. Devianto, L. A., Lusiana, N., & Ramdani, F. (2019). Analisis kerentanan pencemaran air tanah di Kota Batu menggunakan analisis multikriteria spasial dengan indeks DRASTIC. Jurnal Wilayah Dan Lingkungan, 7(2), 90–104. https://doi.org/10.14710/jwl.7.2.90-104
  14. Donald, G. M. (2012). Teaching critical & analytical thinking in high school biology? The American Biology Teacher, 74(3), 178–181. https://doi.org/10.1525/abt.2012.74.3.9
  15. Dwyer, C. P., Hogan, M. J., & Stewart, I. (2014). An integrated critical thinking framework for the 21st century. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 12, 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.12.004
  16. El Nagdi, M., & Roehrig, G. (2020). Identity evolution of STEM teachers in Egyptian STEM schools in a time of transition: A case study. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00235-2
  17. Fadlina, I. M., Supriyono, B., & Soeaidy, S. (2013). Perencanaan pembangunan pertanian berkelanjutan (Kajian tentang pengembangan pertanian organik di Kota Batu). J-Pal, 4(1), 43–57.
  18. Febri, A., Sajidan, S., Sarwanto, S., & Harjunowibowo, D. (2020). Guided Inquiry Lab: Its Effect to Improve Student’s Critical Thinking on Mechanics. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 9(1), 87–97. https://doi.org/10.24042/jipfalbiruni.v9i1.4630
  19. Fiteriani, I., Diani, R., Hamidah, A., & Anwar, C. (2021). Project-based learning through STEM approach: Is it effective to improve students’ creative problem-solving ability and metacognitive skills in physics learning? IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1796(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1796/1/012058
  20. Hira, A., & Anderson, E. (2021). Motivating online learning through project-based learning during the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic. IAFOR Journal of Education, 9(2), 93–110. https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.9.2.06
  21. Howard, J. L., Bureau, J., Guay, F., Chong, J. X. Y., & Ryan, R. M. (2021). Student motivation and associated outcomes: A meta-analysis from self-determination theory. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(6), 1300–1323. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620966789
  22. Hsieh, T. L. (2014). Motivation matters? The relationship among different types of learning motivation, engagement behaviors and learning outcomes of undergraduate students in Taiwan. Higher Education, 68(3), 417–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9720-6
  23. Hunaepi, H., Dewi, I. N., & Sumarjan, S. (2019). Profiling students’ environmental care attitudes taught using Sasak Tribe local wisdom-integrated model. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 5(3), 549–558. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v5i3.10009
  24. Hynes, M., Portsmore, M., Dare, E., Milto, E., Rogers, C., Hammer, D., & Carberry, A. (2011). Infusing Engineering Design into High School STEM Courses. National Center for Enggineering and Technology Education, 8–13.
  25. Ibrahim, H., Hudha, A. M., & Rahardjanto, A. (2014). Keanekaragaman mesofauna tanah daerah pertanian apel Desa Tulungrejo Kecamatan Bumiaji Kota Batu sebagai bioindikator kesuburan tanah. Seminar Nasional XI Pendidikan Biologi FKIP UNS, 581–587.
  26. Ilma, S., Henie, M., Al-Muhdhar, I., Rohman, F., & Sari, M. S. (2022). Promoting students’ metacognitive awareness and cognitive learning outcomes in science education. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 11(1), 20–30. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v11i1.22083
  27. Jirout, J. J., Vitiello, V. E., & Zumbrunn, S. K. (2018). Curiosity in schools. In The New Science of Curiosity. Nova Science Publishers, Inc.
  28. Jumriani, J., Mutiani, M., Putra, M. A. H., Syaharuddin, S., & Abbas, E. W. (2021). The urgency of local wisdom content in social studies learning: Literature review. The Innovation of Social Studies Journal, 2(2), 103. https://doi.org/10.20527/iis.v2i2.3076
  29. Kafai, Y., Proctor, C., & Lui, D. (2020). From theory bias to theory dialogue: Embracing cognitive, situated, and critical framings of computational thinking in K-12 Cs education. ACM Inroads, 11(1), 44–53. https://doi.org/10.1145/3381887
  30. Kazhikenova, G., Zhumataeva, E., Kozhamzharova, М., & Aubakirova, S. (2021). The effectiveness of reflective dialogue in the development of reflective thinking in rising teachers. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41(July). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100902
  31. Kurniawan, B., & Soesilohadi, R. H. (2020). Diversity and abundance of insect in conventional apple (Malus sylvestris (L.) Mill) Plantation at Kota Batu, East Java. Biotropika: Journal of Tropical Biology, 8(3), 194–201. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.biotropika.2020.008.03.08
  32. Lewin, C., & McNicol, S. (2015). Supporting the development of 21st century skills through ICT. KEYCIT 2014: Key Competencies in Informatics and ICT, 181–198.
  33. Li, B., Jia, X., Chi, Y., Liu, X., & Jia, B. (2020). Project-based learning in a collaborative group can enhance student skill and ability in the biochemical laboratory: a case study. Journal of Biological Education, 54(4), 404–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2019.1600570
  34. Liu, F., & Stapleton, P. (2020). Counterargumentation at the primary level: An intervention study investigating the argumentative writing of second language learners. System, 89, 102198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.102198
  35. Manske, S., Hecking, T., Chounta, I. A., Werneburg, S., & Ulrich Hoppe, H. (2015). Using differences to make a difference: A study on heterogeneity of learning groups. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference, CSCL, 1, 182–189.
  36. Miharja, F. J., Hindun, I., & Fauzi, A. (2019). Pemberdayaan keterampilan bertanya siswa melalui pembelajaran inovatif berbasis lesson study. JINoP (Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran), 5(1), 28–38. https://doi.org/10.22219/jinop.v5i1.7187
  37. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methodes sourcebook (3rd Ed.). Sage.
  38. Nahdi, M. S. (2018). Improving research and biological teaching based on local wisdom (ethnobiology). In S. Yamtinah (Ed.), Isu Sosio-Saintifik: Inovasi Penelitian dan Pembelajaran IPA Abad 21 (pp. 17–21). Universitas Sebelas Maret.
  39. Naimnule, L., & Corebima, A. D. (2018). The correlation between metacognitive skills and critical thinking skills toward students ’ process skills in biology learning. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 2(2), 122–134.
  40. Oktavira, A. I., Suarman, D. F., Rifyant, F. A., & Fevria, R. (2022). Application of the Nutrient Film Technique (NFT) hydroponic system water spinach cultivation (Ipomoea sp). Serambi Biologi, 7(2), 157–162. https://doi.org/10.24036/srmb.v7i2.140
  41. Osuafor, A. M., & Amaefuna, I. A. (2016). A survey of biology teachers use of activity-oriented, laboratory practical exercises to promote functional biology education. Education and Learning (EduLearn), 10(3), 281–290.
  42. Oudeyer, P. Y., Gottlieb, J., & Lopes, M. (2016). Intrinsic motivation, curiosity, and learning: Theory and applications in educational technologies. In Progress in Brain Research (1st ed., Vol. 229). Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.pbr.2016.05.005
  43. Ouyang, F., Dai, X., & Chen, S. (2022). Applying multimodal learning analytics to examine the immediate and delayed effects of instructor scaffoldings on small groups’ collaborative programming. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00361-z
  44. Palmgren-Neuvonen, L., Littleton, K., & Hirvonen, N. (2021). Dialogic spaces in divergent and convergent collaborative learning tasks. Information and Learning Science, 12(5–6), 409–431. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-02-2020-0043
  45. Parikesit, M. A. K., Yuliati, Angka, P. R., Gunadhi, A., Joewono, A., & Sitepu, R. (2018). Otomatisasi sistem irigasi dan pemberian kadar nutrisi berdasarkan nilai Total Dissolve Solid (TDS) pada hidroponik Nutrient Film Technique (NFT). Scientific Journal Widya Teknik, 17(2), 63–71. https://doi.org/10.33508/wt.v17i2.1964
  46. Pekrun, R., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2014). International handbook of emotions in education. In International Handbook of Emotions in Education. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203148211
  47. Priemer, B., Eilerts, K., Filler, A., Pinkwart, N., Rösken-Winter, B., Tiemann, R., & Zu Belzen, A. U. (2020). A framework to foster problem-solving in STEM and computing education. Research in Science and Technological Education, 38(1), 105–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2019.1600490
  48. Raiman, M., Liu, A. N. A. M., & Wolo, D. (2021). Investigation of students’ motivation to learn science while studying from home during a pandemic. Journal of Research in Instructional, 1(1), 33–42. https://doi.org/10.30862/jri.v1i1.10
  49. Ramdani, E. (2018). Model pembelajaran kontekstual berbasis kearifan lokal sebagai penguatan pendidikan karakter. Jupiis: Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, 10(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.24114/jupiis.v10i1.8264
  50. Saputro, E. A., Kusuma, M. R., Bobsaid, A. A., Verbiawan, E. A., Firmansyah, Y. K., Sumiati, S., Winursito, Y. C., Putro, R. K. H., & Priyanto, A. D. (2022). Pemetaan potensi sumber mata air di Desa Giripurno, Kecamatan Bumiaji, Kota Batu. Jurnal ENMAP, 3(1), 29–33. https://doi.org/10.23887/em.v3i1.46215
  51. Sari, D. E., Hindun, I., Mahmudati, N., Miharja, F. J., & Fauzi, A. (2020). Are male and female students different in high-order thinking skills? JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 9(1), 42. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v9i1.17575
  52. Shanmugavelu, G., Parasuraman, B., Ariffin, K., Kannan, B., & Vadivelu, M. (2020). Inquiry Method in the Teaching and Learning Process. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 8(3), 6–9. https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v8i3.2396
  53. Shobihah, H. N., Yustiati, A., & Andriani, Y. (2022). Produktivitas budidaya ikan dalam berbagai konstruksi sistem akuaponik (Review). Akuatika Indonesia, 7(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.24198/jaki.v7i1.39441
  54. Sholahuddin, A., Hayati, N., Iriani, R., Saadi, P., & Susilowati, E. (2021). Project-based learning on ethnoscience setting to improve students’ scientific literacy. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2330(March). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0043571
  55. Sulaiman, F., Rosales, J. J., & Kyung, L. J. (2023). The effectiveness of the integrated STEM-PBL physics module on students’ interest, sensemaking, and effort. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 22(1), 113–129. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/23.22.113
  56. Suryawati, E., & Osman, K. (2018). Contextual learning: Innovative approach towards the development of students’ scientific attitude and natural science performance. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(1), 61–76. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/79329
  57. Tania, S. P., Priyanto, E., Timur, J., & Surabaya, K. (2023). Pemetaan potensi komoditas hortikultura unggulan mapping the potential of leading horticultural commodities. Jurnal AgribiSains, 9(1), 51–60.
  58. Teo, T. W., Tan, A. L., Ong, Y. S., & Choy, B. H. (2021). Centricities of STEM curriculum frameworks: Variations of the S-T-E-M Quartet. STEM Education, 1(3), 141. https://doi.org/10.3934/steme.2021011
  59. Tseng, K. H., Chang, C. C., Lou, S. J., & Chen, W. P. (2013). Attitudes towards science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) in a project-based learning (PjBL) environment. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(1), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-011-9160-x
  60. Uge, S., Neolaka, A., & Yasin, M. (2019). Development of social studies learning model based on local wisdom in improving students’ knowledge and social attitude. International Journal of Instruction, 12(3), 375–388. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12323a
  61. Ulfah, I. F., Setiawan, A., & Rahmawati, A. (2017). Pembangunan desa berbasis potensi lokal agrowisata di Desa Bumiaji, Kota Batu, Jawa Timur. Politik Indonesia: Indonesian Political Science Review, 2(1), 46. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpi.v2i1.8486
  62. Vong, S. A., & Kaewurai, W. (2017). Instructional model development to enhance critical thinking and critical thinking teaching ability of trainee students at regional teaching training center in Takeo province, Cambodia. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 38(1), 88–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2016.05.002
  63. Wang, H. H., Lin, H. shyang, Chen, Y. C., Pan, Y. T., & Hong, Z. R. (2021). Modelling relationships among students’ inquiry-related learning activities, enjoyment of learning, and their intended choice of a future STEM career. International Journal of Science Education, 43(1), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1860266
  64. Yew, E. H. J., & Goh, K. (2016). Problem-based learning: An overview of its process and impact on learning. Health Professions Education, 2(2), 75–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpe.2016.01.004
  65. Ylostalo, J. H. (2020). Engaging students into their own learning of foundational genetics concepts through the 5E learning cycle and interleaving teaching techniques. Journal of Biological Education, 54(5), 514–520. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2019.1620311
  66. Yuanita, Y. (2024). Potensi wisata edukasi berbasis experiential learning dan pemasarannya di Kampoeng Kids Kota Batu, Jawa Timur untuk menjangkau segmen pasar yang diharapkan. Syntax Idea, 6(2), 527–540. https://doi.org/10.46799/syntax-idea.v6i2.2967
  67. Zanden, P. J. A. . van der, Meijer, P. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2020). A review study about creativity in adolescence: Where is the social context? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 38(May), 100702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100702