Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to see the extent to which social attitudes and roles in the education unit environment are provided and provided through Social Science Education in the Bethel Dadap Basic Education Unit based on the curriculum journey and in the current digital era. This study uses a qualitative method using a document study instrument or can be called a literature study. The results of this study indicate that technological sophistication also has a negative impact on students, one of which is causing these students to have apathy. Although it is undeniable on the one hand, technological advances also provide various conveniences in human life. Therefore, in this case, it is very important to have cooperation between teachers and students' guardians in order to maximize the social studies learning process in schools so that it can be applied in social life. In addition, from this study it was found that the implementation of the social studies curriculum at Bethel Dadap Elementary School went well because it paid attention to every aspect of the social studies learning indicators.

Keywords

Social Reality Social Education Curriculum

Article Details

References

  1. Alhamuddin. (2014). Sejarah Kurikulum di Indonesia (Studi Analisis Kebijakan Pengembangan Kurikulum). Nur El-Islam, 1(2), 48–58. Retrieved from https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/226468-sejarah-kurikulum-di-indonesia-studi-ana-bac69203.pdf
  2. Bakti, S. (2006). Metode Penelitian. Jakarta: Wedatama Widya Sastra.
  3. Bruner, J. S. (1978). The Role of Dialogue in Language Acquisition. New York: Springer-Verlag.
  4. Dahlan, A. (2015). Kurikulum Pendidikan 1968. Retrieved from Eureka Pendidikan website: https://eurekapendidikan.com/kurikulum-pendidikan-1968
  5. Gunawan, R. (2016). Pendidikan IPS: Filosofi, Konsep & Aplikasi. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  6. Kunandar. (2013). Penilaian Autentik (Penilaian Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik Berdasarkan Kurikulum 2013). Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
  7. Kurniasih, S. (2014). Strategi-Strategi Pembelajaran. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  8. Muzamiroh, M. L. (2013). Kupas Tuntas Kurikulum 2013. Surabaya: Kata Pena.
  9. Nurhalim, M. (2011). Analisis Perkembangan Kurikulum di Indonesia (Sebuah Tinjauan Desain dan Pendekatan). INSANIA : Jurnal Pemikiran Alternatif Kependidikansania, 16(3), 340–350. Retrieved from http://www.ejournal.iainpurwokerto.ac.id/index.php/insania/article/view/1597
  10. Piagiet, J. (1963). The origins of intelligence in children. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc.
  11. Setiawan, W. (2017). Era Digital dan Tantangannya. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan 2017, 1–9. Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. Retrieved from http://eprints.ummi.ac.id/151/2/1. Era Digital dan Tantangannya.pdf
  12. Soemantri, M. N. (2001). Menggagas Pembaharuan Pendidikan IPS. Bandung: Rosda Karya.
  13. Sudirman, A. . (2006). Pengembangan Kurikulum Pendidikan IPS di Indonesia: Sebuah Alternatif. Seminar Internasional HISPISI Dengan Tema: Komparasi Pendidikan IPS Antarbangsa. Semarang: Universitas Negeri Semarang.
  14. Wagiran. (2007). Inovasi Pembelajaran dalam Penyiapan Tenaga Kerja Masa Depan. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Dan Kejuruan, 16(1), 41–55. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21831/jptk.v16i1.9312