Indonesian English University Students’ Perception on Plagiarism in an Online World

  • Made Hery Santosa Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
  • A.A. Gede Yudha Paramartha Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Indonesia
  • Ratih Mas Absari Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Indonesia

Abstract

This study was to investigate Indonesian English University students’ perception on plagiarism in an online world. This study was a mixed-method with explanatory sequential design. The population and sample in this study were 633 EFL students in a University in North Bali, Indonesia. Two instruments were employed to collect the data, namely a questionnaire and an interview guide which were developed based on three dimensions, namely knowledge about plagiarism, attitudes toward plagiarism, and beliefs to prevent plagiarism. The questionnaire consisted of 14 valid statements while the interview guide consisted of 19 valid questions. The data were analyzed descriptively. The result showed that 62.88% of EFL students reported to have positive and very positive knowledge about plagiarism, 69.87% of EFL students reported to have positive and very positive attitudes toward plagiarism, and 72.27% of EFL students reported to have positive and very positive beliefs to prevent plagiarism. This implies that the EFL students were aware about plagiarism and they tended not to plagiarize on their assignments. However, finding trusted sources and paraphrasing sentences were the students’ most challenges on plagiarism in the online world. Familiarizing with concept, understanding, referencing style and system, like APA, Mendeley, and subscribing to online database, like ERIC or DOAJ are highly suggested.

References

Ali, W., Ismail, H., & Cheat, T. (2012). Plagiarism: To What Extent It is Understood? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, 604-611.
Bennet, R. (2005). Factors Associated with Student Plagiarism in a Post‐1992 University. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(2), 137-162.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2007). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. CA: Sage.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (2nd ed.). CA: Sage: Thousand Oaks.
Darwish, S. A., & Sadeqi, A. A. (2016). Reasons for College Students to Plagiarize in EFL Writing: Students' Motivation to Pass. International Education Studies, 9(9). Retrieved July 2, 2018, from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1112609.pdf
Davis. (2015). Avoiding Plagiarism. Office of Student Support and Judicial Affairs.
Fish, R., & Hura, G. (2013). Students' Perceptions of Plagiarism. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 13(5), 33-45.
Foltynek, T., Rybicka, J., & Demoliou, C. (2014, June). Do Students Think What Teachers Think about Plagiarism? International Journal for Educational Integrity, 10(1), 21-30. Retrieved from http://www.ojs.unisa.edu.au/journals/index.php/IJEI/
Gomez, J., Salazar, I., & Vargas, P. (2013). Dishonest Behavior and Plagiarism by University Students: An Application to Management Studies. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 83, 766-770.
Grijalva, T. C., Kerkvliet, J., & Nowell, C. (2006). Academic Honesty in Online Courses. College Student Journal, 40(1).
Guillemard, M. (2015, March 2). Finding Free Journal Articles Online. Retrieved June 28, 2018, from Healt Writer Hub: https://www.healthwriterhub.com/free-journal-articles/
Harrel, C. (2009). Choosing an Online Plagiarism Detector to Check for Plagiarism. Retrieved from http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Christine_Harrel
Hosny, M. I., & Fatima, S. (2014). Attitude of Students Towards Cheating and Plagiarism: University Case Study. Journal of Applied Sciences. doi:10.3923/jas.2014
Hu, G., & Lei, J. (2014). Chinese University Students’ Perceptions of Plagiarism. Ethics & Behavior.
Katsampozaki-Hodgetts, K. (2015). Academic English Section 9: Paraphrasing Techniques. University of Crete. Retrieved June 28, 2018, from https://opencourses.uoc.gr/courses/pluginfile.php/16678/mod_resource/content/0/Presentation%209%20-%20Paraphrasing%20techniques.pdf
Koch, A. (2012). Writing Well - Paraphrasing. Student Learning Advisory Service. Retrieved June 28, 2018, from https://www.kent.ac.uk/learning/documents/student-support/slasworkshops/paraphrasing1213ak311012.pdf
Macatangay, J. (2015). Understanding, Perception and Prevalence of Plagiarism among College Freshman Students of De La Salle Lipa, Philippines. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 5(8).
Manalu, M. H. (2013). Students' Perception on Plagiarism. 71-80.
McCabe, D. L. (2003). Promoting Academic Integrity: A US/Canadian Perspective. Educational Integrity: Plagiarism and Other Perplexities, Proceedings of the First Australasian Integrity Conference.
Murtaza, G., Zafar, S., Bashir, I., & Hussain, I. (2013). Evaluation of Student's Perception and Behavior towards Plagiarism in Pakistani Universities. Acta Biotheica, 19(1), 125-130.
Park, C. (2003). In Other (People’s) Words: Plagiarism by University Students--Literature and Lessons. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(5), 471-488. doi:10.1080/02602930301677
Permana, I. G., & Santosa, M. H. (2018). EFL Students' Perception on Plagiarism. In C. I. Rumimpunu, D. Setiawan, I. S. Tehuayo, M. Patricia, N. KristivaUtomo, & N. E. Alamsyah (Ed.), Language in the Online & Offline World 6: The Fortitude (pp. 128-133). Surabaya: Petra Press.
Permana, I. Y., & Santosa, M. H. (2018). EFL Students' Perception on Plagiarism. Language in the Online and Offline World 6 (pp. 128-133). Surabaya: Petra Press. Retrieved from ht t ps://www.researchgat e.net /publ i cat i on/325258487
Razera, D. (2011). Awareness, Attitude and Perception of Plagiarism among Students and Teachers at Stockholm University. Master of Science Thesis Stockholm.
Robert, T. S. (2008). Student Plagiarism in an Online World: An Introduction.
Salija, K., Hidayat, R., & Patak, A. A. (2016). Mendeley Impact on Scientific Writing: Thematic Analysis. International Journal on Advanced Science Engineering Information Technology, 6(5). Retrieved July 1, 2018, from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Rahmat_Hidayat12/publication/309603780_Mendeley_Impact_on_Scientific_Writing_Thematic_Analysis/links/590af70a458515ebb4a6612e/Mendeley-Impact-on-Scientific-Writing-Thematic-Analysis.pdf
Santosa, M. H. (2017). Learning Approaches of Indonesian EFL Gen Z Students in a Flipped Learning Context. Journal on English as a Foreign Language, 7(2). Retrieved July 2, 2018, from http://e-journal.iain-palangkaraya.ac.id/index.php/jefl/article/view/689/723
Shahabuddin, S. (2009). Plagiarism in Academia. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 21(3), 353-359. Retrieved from http://www.isetl.org/ijtlhe/
Sutton, A., Taylor, D., & Johnston, C. (2014). A model for exploring student understandings of plagiarism. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 38(1), 129-146.
Underwood, J., & Szabo, A. (2003). Academic Offences and E-learning: Individual Propensities in Cheating. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(4), 467-77.
Walker, J. (2010). Measuring Plagiarism: Researching What Students Do, Not What They Say They Do. Studies in Higher Education, 1, 41-59. doi:10.1080/03075070902912994
Published
2019-08-26
How to Cite
SANTOSA, Made Hery; PARAMARTHA, A.A. Gede Yudha; ABSARI, Ratih Mas. Indonesian English University Students’ Perception on Plagiarism in an Online World. Journal of ELT Research: The Academic Journal of Studies in English Language Teaching and Learning, [S.l.], p. 100-114, aug. 2019. ISSN 2527-7448. Available at: <https://journal.uhamka.ac.id/index.php/jer/article/view/2846>. Date accessed: 17 nov. 2019. doi: https://doi.org/10.22236/JER_Vol4Issue2pp100-114.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.