Analysis of The Occurrence of Reversible Reasoning for Inverse Cases: A Case Study on The Subject Adjie
Abstract
Background. Student reasoning in learning mathematics contributes significantly to the achievement of student mathematics learning outcomes. The main objective of this study is to investigate the process of reversible reasoning in students for inverse problems, in the case of Adjie (Ad). The research method used to reveal the reversible reasoning in Adjie's case using descriptive qualitative research methods. Sampling was carried out using purposive sampling technique where the research sample was selected based on reversible reasoning criteria. Retrieval research data uses the results of students' mathematical work, think aloud, interviews, and the components that cause reversible reasoning. The results of our study found that the process begins with an obstacle that causes Ad to be unable to continue the resolution process, resulting in a metacognition process by analyzing the problem again analytically and developing other heuristic strategies. Ad shows a change in perspective where he initially interpreted inverse as the act of swapping independent and dependent variables and switched to interpreting inverse as the opposite of a function process involving analogy and image representation. The contribution of this research provides knowledge that reversible reasoning can occur in understanding and solving mathematical problems in inverse material.
Latar belakang. Penalaran siswa dalam pembelajaran matematika memberikan kontribusi yang signifikan terhadap pencapaian hasil belajar matematika siswa. Tujuan utama dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menyelidiki proses penalaran reversibel pada siswa untuk masalah invers, dalam kasus Adjie (Ad). Metode penelitian yang digunakan untuk mengungkap alasan reversibel pada kasus Adjie menggunakan metode penelitian deskriptif kualitatif. Pengambilan sampel dilakukan dengan menggunakan teknik purposive sampling dimana sampel penelitian dipilih berdasarkan kriteria penalaran yang dapat dibalik. Pengambilan data penelitian menggunakan hasil kerja matematis siswa, think aloud, wawancara, dan komponen penyebab reversible Reasoning. Hasil penelitian kami menemukan bahwa proses tersebut diawali dengan adanya kendala yang menyebabkan Ad tidak dapat melanjutkan proses penyelesaiannya sehingga terjadi proses metakognisi dengan menganalisis kembali permasalahan tersebut secara analitis dan mengembangkan strategi heuristik lainnya. Iklan menunjukkan perubahan cara pandang dimana awalnya ia mengartikan invers sebagai tindakan menukar variabel independen dan dependen dan beralih mengartikan invers sebagai kebalikan dari proses fungsi yang melibatkan analogi dan representasi gambar. Kontribusi penelitian ini memberikan pengetahuan bahwa penalaran reversibel dapat terjadi dalam pemahaman dan penyelesaian masalah matematika pada materi invers.
Full text article
References
Chun, J. (2017). Construction of the Sum of Two Covarying Oriented Quantities. Potential Analysis. University of Georgia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11118-013-9365-6
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Educational Research (Vol. 4). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Di Stefano, M., Litster, K., & MacDonald, B. L. (2017). Mathematics Intervention Supporting Allen, a Latino EL: A Case Study. Education Sciences, 7(2), 57. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci7020057
Dougherty, B., Bryant, D. P., Bryant, B. R., & Shin, M. (2016). Helping Students With Mathematics Difficulties Understand Ratios and Proportions. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 49(2), 96–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059916674897
Dougherty, B. J., Bryant, D. P., Bryant, B. R., Darrough, R. L., & Pfannenstiel, K. H. (2015). Developing Concepts and Generalizations to Build Algebraic Thinking: The Reversibility, Flexibility, and Generalization Approach. Intervention in School and Clinic, 50(5), 273–281. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451214560892
Flanders, S. T. (2014). Investigating Flexibility, Reversibility, and Multiple Representation in a Calculus Enviroment. University of Pittsburg.
Goldin, G. A. (2000). A Scientific Perspective on Structured, Task-Based Interviews in Mathematics Education Research. Handbook of Research Design in Mathematics and Science Education. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410602725.ch19
Haciomeroglu, E. S. (2007). Calculus Student's Understanding of Derivative Graphs: Problem of Representation in Calculus. The Florida State University.
Haciomeroglu, E. S., Aspinwall, L., & Presmeg, N. (2009). The role of reversibility in the learning of the calculus derivative and antiderivative graphs. Proceedings of the 31st Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Vol. 5, 5, 81–88.
Haciomeroglu, E. S., Aspinwall, L., & Presmeg, N. C. (2010). Contrasting cases of calculus students' understanding of derivative graphs. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 12(2), 152–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986060903480300
Hackenberg, A. J. (2010). Students' reasoning with reversible multiplicative relationships. Cognition and Instruction, 28(4), 383–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2010.511565
Hackenberg, A. J. (2013). The fractional knowledge and algebraic reasoning of students with the first multiplicative concept. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 32(3), 538–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2013.06.007
Hackenberg, A. J., & Lee, M. Y. (2015). Relationships between students' fractional knowledge and equation writing. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 46(2), 196–243. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.46.2.0196
Hackenberg, A. J., & Lee, M. Y. (2016). Students' distributive reasoning with fractions and unknowns. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 93(2), 245–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-016-9704-9
Inhelder, & Piaget. (1958). The Growth of Logical Thinking From Child to Adolecence. New York: Basic Books, Inc.
Kim, Y. R., Park, M. S., Moore, T. J., & Varma, S. (2013). Multiple levels of metacognition and their elicitation through complex problem-solving tasks. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 32(3), 377–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2013.04.002
Krutetskii, V. A. (1976). The Psychology of Mathematical Abilities in Schoolchildren. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education (Vol. 8). https://doi.org/10.2307/748528
Lee, M. Y., & Hackenberg, A. J. (2014). Relationships Between Fractional Knowledge and Algebraic Reasoning: the Case of Willa. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(4), 975–1000. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9442-8
Leron, U., & Hazzan, O. (2009). Intuitive vs analytical thinking: Four perspectives. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 71(3), 263–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-008-9175-8
Leron, U., & Paz, T. (2014). Functions via everyday actions: Support or obstacle? Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 36, 126–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2014.09.005
Linchevski, L., & Herscovics, N. (1996). Crossing the cognitive gap between arithmetic and algebra: Operating on the unknown in the context of equations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 30(1), 39–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00163752
Lubin, A., Simon, G., Houdé, O., & De Neys, W. (2015). Inhibition, conflict detection, and number conservation. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 47(5), 793–800. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0649-0
Mackrell, K. (2011). Design decisions in interactive geometry software. ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education, 43(3), 373–387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-011-0327-4
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (Third Edit). United States of America: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Nathan, M. J., & Koedinger, K. R. (2000). Teachers' and researchers' beliefs about the development of algebraic reasoning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(2), 168–190. https://doi.org/10.2307/749750
Nolte, M., & Pamperien, K. (2017). Challenging problems in a regular classroom setting and in a special foster programme. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 49(1), 121–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0825-5
Paoletti, T. (2015). Pre-Service Teachers' Development of Bidirectional Reasoning.
Paoletti, T., Stevens, I. E., Hobson, N. L. F., Moore, K. C., & LaForest, K. R. (2018). Inverse function: Pre-service teachers' techniques and meanings. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 97(1), 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-017-9787-y
Ramful, A. (2009). Reversible Reasoning In Multiplicative Situations: Conceptual Analysis, Affordances And Constra1nts. Dissertation.
Ramful, A. (2014). Reversible reasoning in fractional situations: Theorems-in-action and constraints. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 33, 119–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2013.11.002
Ramful, A. (2015). Reversible reasoning and the working backwards problem solving strategy. Australian Mathematics Teacher, 71(4), 28–32.
Ramful, A., & Olive, J. (2008). Reversibility of thought: An instance in multiplicative tasks. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 27(2), 138–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2008.07.005
Ron Tzur. (2011). Can Dual Processing Theories of Thinking Inform Conceptual Learning in Mathematics? The Mathematics Enthusiast, 8(3), 597–636. Retrieved from http://scholarworks.umt.edu/tme/vol8/iss3/7%5Cnhttp://jasonadair.wiki.westga.edu/file/view/Can+Dual+Processing+Theories+of+Thinking+Inform+Conceptual+Learning+in+Mathematics.pdf/349220092/Can Dual Processing Theories of Thinking Inform Conceptual Learning
Sangwin, C. J., & Jones, I. (2017). Asymmetry in student achievement on multiple-choice and constructed-response items in reversible mathematics processes. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 94(2), 205–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-016-9725-4
Simon, M. A., Kara, M., Placa, N., & Sandir, H. (2016). Categorizing and promoting reversibility of mathematical concepts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 93(2), 137–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-016-9697-4
Simon, M. A., Placa, N., & Avitzur, A. (2016). Participatory and anticipatory stages of mathematical concept learning: Further empirical and theoretical development. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 47(1), 63–93. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.47.1.0063
Sriraman, B. (2015). Problem Solving , and the Ability to Formulate Generalizations"¯:, XIV(3), 151–165.
Steffe, L. P. (2002). Chapter 1 A New Hypothesis Concerning Children ' s Fractional Knowledge. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 20(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0591-8
Steffe, L. P., & Olive, J. (2009). Children's fractional knowledge. Springer Science & Business Media.
Tzur, R. (2004). Teacher and students' joint production of a reversible fraction conception. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 23(1), 93–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2003.12.006
Tzur, R. (2007). Fine grain assessment of students' mathematical understanding: Participatory and anticipatory stagesin learning a new mathematical conception. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66(3), 273–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-007-9082-4
Tzur, R., & Simon, M. (2004). Distinguishing two stages of mathematics conceptual learning. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2(2), 287–304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-004-7479-4
Vergnaud, G. (1998). A comprehensive theory of representation for mathematics education. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 17(2), 167–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0364-0213(99)80057-3
Vilkomir, T., & O'Donoghue, J. (2009). Using components of mathematical ability for initial development and identification of mathematically promising students. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 40(2), 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207390802276200
Yimer, A., & Ellerton, N. F. (2010). A five-phase model for mathematical problem solving: Identifying synergies in pre-service-teachers' metacognitive and cognitive actions. ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education, 42(2), 245–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-009-0223-3
Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
