Article Sidebar

Submitted
14 December 2021
Accepted
8 February 2022
Published
30 April 2022
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 272 Download : 232

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Background: Karya ilmiah dan literasi remaja merupakan keterampilan yang penting untuk dimiliki oleh generasi abad 21. Metode: Mitra dalam kegiatan pengabdian ini adalah siswa dan pengasuh Panti Asuhan Putri ‘aisiah Riverside yang keseluruhan berjumlah 15 orang. Metode pengabdian yang dilakukan adalah dengan Focus Group Discussion (FGD), pembentukan kelompok KIR, serta pembuatan KIR. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan menggunakan instrumen pre-test serta rubrik penilaian artikel karya ilmiah remaja. Hasil: Hasil program pengabdian menunjukkan bahwa pemahaman awal siswa tentang KIR tergolong. Selanjutnya perolehan skor awal KIR yang dihasilkan oleh dua kelompok siswa yang terpilih untuk lomba karya tulis ilmiah (LKTI) remaja nasional hanya mencapai 36 dan 53. Namun, setelah pendampingan yang dilakukan oleh tim pengabdian masyarakat, skornya meningkat signifikan mencapai 70 dan 95 sehingga salah satu dari dua kelompok tersebut memenangkan LKTI nasional sebagai juara ketiga. Kesimpulan: Pendampingan untuk memperkuat keterampilan remaja dalam membuat karya ilmiah dan literasi sangat disarankan selama pandemi COVID-19.

Keywords

Competition Scientific Work Scientific Literacy Scientific Writing Youth Anak muda Karya Ilmiah Literasi Karya Tulis Ilmiah Kerja Ilmiah Kompetisi

Article Details

License

© 2022 Oleh authors. Lisensi Jurnal Solma, LPPM-Uhamka, Jakarta. Artikel ini bersifat open access yang didistribusikan di bawah syarat dan ketentuan Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

How to Cite
Fatmawati, D., Moh. Mirza Nuryady, Ilma Nurul Khoiriyah, Anggitania Dyan Anggraini, & Lisma Dahlia. (2022). Penguatan Karya Ilmiah Remaja selama Pandemi COVID-19 untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Menulis Literasi Ilmiah Remaja . Jurnal SOLMA, 11(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.22236/solma.v11i1.8058
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Adzliana Mohd Daud, Jizah Omar, Punia Turiman, & Kamisah Osman. (2012). Creativity in science education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, 467 – 474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.302
  2. Akbar, A. (2017). Membudayakan literasi dengan program 6M di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar, 3(1), 42. https://doi.org/10.30870/jpsd.v3i1.1093
  3. Bolderdijk, J. W., Lehman, P. K., & Geller, E. S. (2018). Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour with rewards and penalties. In Environmental Psychology (Issue January, pp. 273–282). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119241072.ch27
  4. Bridgers, S., Jara-Ettinger, J., & Gweon, H. (2020). Young children consider the expected utility of others' learning to decide what to teach. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(2), 144–152. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0748-6
  5. Budd, S. (2020). Science literacy in a changing World: Covid-19 and CitySprouts Youth. CitySprouts.
  6. Chiou, C. C., Wang, Y. M., & Lee, L. T. (2014). Reducing statistics anxiety and enhancing statistics learning achievement: Effectiveness of a one-minute strategy. Psychological Reports, 115(1), 297–310. https://doi.org/10.2466/11.04.PR0.115c12z3
  7. DeBoer, G. E. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 582–601. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200008)37:6<582::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-L
  8. Dole, S. F., Bloom, L. A., & Doss, K. K. (n.d.). Rocket to creativity: A field experience in problem-based and project-based learning.
  9. Edwards, A., Jones, S. M., Bird, F. L., & Parry, L. J. (2010). International journal of innovation in science and mathematics education IJISME. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education (Formerly CAL-Laborate International), 22(2), 35–54. https://openjournals.library.sydney.edu.au/index.php/CAL/article/view/7120/8362
  10. Fatmawati, D., & Fauzi, A. (2019). Statistics mastering profile of students in biology education study program. Unnes Science Education Journal, 8(1), 69–75. https://doi.org/10.15294/usej.v8i1.29381
  11. Gunawan, A Harjono, H Sahidu, & Nisrina. (2018). Improving students' creativity using cooperative learning with virtual media on static fluida concept. International Conference on Science Education (ICoSEd) . https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1006/1/012016
  12. Howell, E. L., & Brossard, D. (2021). (Mis)informed about what? What it means to be a science-literate citizen in a digital world. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(15), e1912436117. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1912436117
  13. Kos, M., Jerman, J., & Torkar, G. (2021). Preschool children's attitude toward some unpopular animals and formation of a positive attitude toward them through hands-on activities. Journal of Biological Education, 00(00), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2021.1877779
  14. Kurnia, N., & Astuti, S. I. (2017). Peta Gerakan Literasi Digital di Indonesia: Studi tentang pelaku, ragam kegiatan, kelompok sasaran dan mitra yang dilakukan oleh Japelidi. Informasi, 47(2), 149. https://doi.org/10.21831/informasi.v47i2.16079
  15. Lin, C.-S., & Wu, R. Y.-W. (2016). Effects of web-based creative thinking teaching on students' creativity and Learning Outcome. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(6), 1675–1684. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1558a
  16. Nugraha, D., & Octavianah, D. (2020). Diskursus literasi abad 21 di Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Edutama, 7(1), 107. https://doi.org/10.30734/jpe.v7i1.789
  17. Permana, T. I., & Fatmawati, D. (2019). Pendampingan penulisan Karya Ilmiah Remaja untuk meningkatkan kreativitas dan literasi. International Journal of Community Service Learning, 3(3), 101. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijcsl.v3i3.20867
  18. PISA. (2015). DRAFT SCIENCE FRAMEWORK.
  19. Ridho, S., Aminah, N. S., & Supriyanto, A. (2018). The profile of scientific literacy skill student at SMA Batik 2 Surakarta. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 4(2), 47–54. https://doi.org/10.21009/1.04201
  20. Sagala, N. L., Rahmatsyah, & Simanjuntak, M. P. (2017). The influence of problem based learning model on scientific process skill and problem solving ability of student. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 7(4), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-0704040109
  21. Sato, M. (2013). Mereformasi sekolah-Konsep dan praktek komunitas belajar. PELITA/IDCJ.
  22. Schwartz, S. (2020, March). Teaching about coronavirus: 3 lesson plans for science, Mmath, and media literacy. Teaching Now - Education Week Teacher.
  23. Sherzod Ramankulov, Indira Usembaeva, Dinara Berdi, Bakhitzhan Omarov, Bagdat Baimukhanbetov, & Nurdaulet Shektibayev. (2016). Formation of the creativity of students in the context of the education informatization. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 11(16), 9598–9613.
  24. Singh, C. (2009). Problem solving and learning. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1140, 183–197.
  25. Syahriyani, A. (2010). Optimalisasi budaya literasi di kalangan mahasiswa. Jurnal UI Untuk Bangsa Seri Sosial Dan Humaniora, 1, 67–78.
  26. Talat, A., & Chaudhry, H. F. (2014). The effect of PBL and 21st century skills on students' creativity and competitiveness in private schools. The Lahore Journal of Business, 2(2), 89–114.