Article Sidebar

Submitted
18 September 2025
Accepted
15 October 2025
Published
5 December 2025
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 17

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Background: The implementation of the Independent Curriculum in Raudhatul Atfhal (RA) Wagir-Pakisaji District still faces challenges, especially in the preparation of the Learning Objectives Flow (ATP) and technology integration. This research aims to assist teachers in compiling contextual ATP while improving technology utilization skills in early childhood learning. The method used is Community Based Research (CBR) with the support of Rapid Rural Appraisal (RRA), involving RA teachers as active partners. Data were collected through observations, interviews, FGDs, and questionnaires, then analyzed in a simple qualitative and quantitative descriptive. The results showed that 78% of teachers need assistance in the preparation of ATP, while 84% do not understand the integration of technology, especially in the arrangement of toys. Through two-stage training and mentoring, teachers experienced significant improvements: understanding of basic concepts of ATP reached the good category (mean 3.9–4.4) and simple technology use skills increased (mean 3.7–4.1). Real products in the form of contextual ATP documents and the design of the arrangement of play equipment were successfully produced by teachers. The conclusion of this study shows that CBR-based workshops are effective in increasing the capacity of RA teachers, although technological integration still requires continuous strengthening. This activity has the potential to be replicated in other PAUD units as a strategy to optimize the implementation of the Independent Curriculum.

Keywords

Learning objectives flow RA teacher Technology Alur Tujuan Pembelajaran (ATP) Guru RA Teknologi

Article Details

License
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

© 2025 Oleh authors. Lisensi Jurnal SOLMA, LPPM-Uhamka, Jakarta. Artikel ini bersifat open access yang didistribusikan di bawah syarat dan ketentuan Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

How to Cite
Dewi, M. S., Sulistyani, I. R., Shafa, I. L. R., & Zuhriya, I. (2025). Pelatihan Praktik Pembelajaran Guru RA melalui Penyusunan Alur Tujuan Pembelajaran (ATP) Berbasis Teknologi . Jurnal SOLMA, 14(3), 3465–3475. https://doi.org/10.22236/solma.v14i3.20855
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Alcolea-Díaz, G., Reig, R., & Mancinas-Chávez, R. (2020). UNESCO’s media and information literacy curriculum for teachers from the perspective of structural considerations of information. Comunicar, 28(62). https://doi.org/10.3916/C62-2020-09
  2. Alromaih, M. A., Elsayed, S. A., & Alibraheim, E. A. (2022). Study of Project-Based Learning to Improve the Instructional Design Process of Pre-service Early Childhood Teachers. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 12(12), 1381–1389. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2022.12.12.1762
  3. Asmara, A., Judijanto, L., Hita, I. P. A. D., & Saddhono, K. (2023). Media Pembelajaran Berbasis Teknologi: Apakah Memiliki Pengaruh terhadap Peningkatan Kreativitas pada Anak Usia Dini? Jurnal Obsesi: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 7(6), 7253–7261. https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v7i6.5728
  4. Azis, F., Kaharuddin, K., Arifin, J., Yumriani, Y., Nawir, M., Nursalam, N., Quraisy, H., Rosa, I., Nuramal, N., & Karlina, Y. (2022). Pendampingan Penguatan Model Pembelajaran Paradigma Baru Bagi Guru-Guru Sekolah Muhammadiyah Di Kecamatan Bontonompo Selatan. Jurnal Abdimas Indonesia, 2(4), 515–523. https://doi.org/10.53769/jai.v2i4.337
  5. Dewi, M. S. (2021). Hubungan Kompetensi Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK), Efikasi Diri, Perceived Ease of Use dan Keefetifan Integrasi Teknologi. Universitas Negeri Malang.
  6. Dewi, M. S. (2024). Analisis Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK), Efikasi Diri, dan Kesiapan Guru Pada Kurikulum Merdeka Fase Fondasi. Kiddo: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Anak Usia Dini, 5(1), 17–35. https://doi.org/10.19105/kiddo.v5i1.11932
  7. Dewi, M. S., Sulistiani, I. R., Kartika, N. F., & Yulianto, A. R. (2024). Improving teachers’ capabilities in preparation of Merdeka Curriculum intracurricular learning assessment. Abdimas: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Merdeka Malang, 9(3), 725–738. https://doi.org/10.26905/abdimas.v9i3.13494
  8. Gumilar, G., Rosid, D. P. S., Sumardjoko, B., & Ghufron, A. (2023). Urgensi Penggantian Kurikulum 2013 menjadi Kurikulum Merdeka. Jurnal Papeda: Jurnal Publikasi Pendidikan Dasar, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.36232/jurnalpendidikandasar.v5i2.4528
  9. Kemendikbud. (2022). Capaian Pembelajaran Fase Fondasi. Kemendibudristek, 1–38. Diakses pada: https://kurikulum.kemdikbud.go.id/file/1678157827_capaian.pdf
  10. Maskur, M. (2023). Dampak Pergantian Kurikulum Pendidikan Terhadap Peserta Didik Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Keguruan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan (JKIP), 1(3), 190–203. https://doi.org/10.61116/jkip.v1i3.172
  11. Mayer, B., Blume, A., Black, C., & Stevens, S. (2019). Improving Student Learning Outcomes through Community-based Research: The Poverty Workshop. Teaching Sociology, 47(2), 135–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X18818251
  12. Prasetyo, A. R., Aulia, F., Kusuma, F. I., Roziqin, M. F. A., Rahmawati, N., Surya, E. P., Aruna, A., & Adinda Marcelliantika. (2024). Penerapan Kursus Berbasis Rapid Rural Appraisal Sebagai Upaya Internasionalisasi Konten Media Pembelajaran Augmented Reality. El-Mal: Jurnal Kajian Ekonomi & Bisnis Islam, 5(11), 4328–4343. https://doi.org/10.47467/elmal.v5i11.3997
  13. Robbani, S. K., Sulistiani, I. R., & Jannah, S. (2023). Analisis Peran Guru Sebagai Fasilitator Bagi Siswa Kelas VII Di SMPN 5 Karangploso. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 8(8).
  14. Santiani, S., Effendi, E., Salam, S., Rustan, F. R., Bachtiar, E., Rahma, F. I., Yassir, M., Soraya, S., Yawan, H., Hilyana, F. S., Wardhani, D. K., Heryyanoor, H., Sari, S., Nasar, A., Zulaeha, O., Zuriah, N., Demulawa, M., Rachman, A., & Larekeng, S. H. (2024). Transformasi Pembelajaran dalam Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar. In Penerbit Mifandi Mandiri Digital (Vol. 1, Issue 1). https://jurnal.mifandimandiri.com/index.php/penerbitmmd/article/view/113
  15. Suhandi, A. M., & Robi’ah, F. (2022). Guru dan Tantangan Kurikulum Baru: Analisis Peran Guru dalam Kebijakan Kurikulum Baru. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(4), 5936–5945. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i4.3172
  16. Sulistiani, I. R., Setyosari, P., Sa’dijah, C., & Praherdhiono, H. (2024). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge of Preservice Elementary Teachers: Relationship to Self-Regulation and Technology Integration Self-Efficacy. European Journal of Educational Research, 13(1), 159–170. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.13.1.159
  17. Sutama, W. I., Astuti, W., Endah, D., & Aini, N. (2023). The Development of Teaching Literacy and Numeracy Materials Based on the Problem and Project for 5–6 Year Olds Children. Proceedings of the International Conference on Educational Management and Technology (ICEMT 2022), 154–164. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-494069-95-4