Main Article Content

Abstract

Background: This Community Service (PkM) activity aims to enhance the reasoning and proof competencies of Mathematics teachers in Prabumulih City through training in the use of Geometer's Sketchpad software. An initial survey identified that many teachers had a negative perception of mathematical proof, felt difficulty in constructing proofs, and lacked the use of technology in teaching. Methods: The training was conducted in a hybrid format, combining face-to-face and online methods, with an emphasis on interactive approaches. Result: The results showed a significant increase in teachers' understanding of mathematical concepts and their ability to construct proofs. Approximately 90% of teachers stated that evidence-based learning improves the quality of education. Although progress was made, additional training is still needed for some teachers who struggled with using Geometer's Sketchpad. These findings highlight the importance of ongoing support and further training to sustain teachers' competency development, as well as encourage the application of more innovative teaching methods. Conclusion: Thus, this activity is expected to improve the quality of mathematics education in schools and prepare students to face academic challenges in the future.

Keywords

Geometers Sketchpad Mathematics Proof Mathematics Reasoning Geometers Sketchpad Penalaran Matematis Pembuktian Matematis

Article Details

How to Cite
Kurniadi, E., Hartono, Y., Retna Safitri, E., & Siska Utari, R. (2025). Pelatihan Menyusun Bukti dengan Sketchpad Bagi Guru Matematika SMA di Kota Prabumulih. Jurnal SOLMA, 14(1), 1012–1022. https://doi.org/10.22236/solma.v14i1.16672

References

  1. Alkhateeb, M. A., & Al-Duwairi, A. M. (2019). The Effect of Using Mobile Applications (GeoGebra and Sketchpad) on the Students’ Achievement. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5754
  2. Balalle, H. (2024). Exploring student engagement in technology-based education in relation to gamification, online/distance learning, and other factors: A systematic literature review. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 9, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.100870
  3. Capaian Pembelajaran Pada Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, Jenjang Pendidikan Dasar Dan Jenjang Pendidikan Menengah Pada Kurikulum Merdeka, Kemdikbudristek (2022).
  4. Çevikbaş, M., Greefrath, G., & Siller, H.-S. (2023). Advantages and challenges of using digital technologies in mathematical modelling education – a descriptive systematic literature review. Frontiers in Education. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1142556
  5. Galili, R., Hartono, Y., & Hiltiramartin, C. (2023). Desain Pembelajaran Identitas Trigonometri Dengan Proof Based Learning di SMA. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(3), 2287–2298. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v7i3.2677
  6. Hartono, Y., Kurniadi, E., & Pratiwi, W. D. (2023). Mathematics teachers’ perception on mathematical proof. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2811(1). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0142291
  7. Hartono, Y., Maya Puspita, F., Sari, N., Helen Simarmata, R., Kurniadi, E., Matematika, P., kepada Masyarakat Corespondensi Author, P., Matematika, P., & Sriwijaya Jl Gubernur Bastari Lrg, U. H. (2021). Pendampingan Guru Matematika Sekolah Menengah dalam Pembuktian Matematika.
  8. Herizal, Suhendra, & Nurlaelah, E. (2020). Pengaruh Kemampuan Memahami Bukti Matematis terhadap Kemampuan Mengonstruksi Bukti Matematis pada Topik Trigonometri. Suska Journal of Mathematics Education, 6(1), 17–24.
  9. Martin, C. H., Hartono, Y., Pratiwin, W. D., Scristia, Yukans, S. S., Utari, R. S., & Azka, D. A. (2024). Assistance for Mathematics Subject Teacher Deliberations in designing students worksheet based on problem solving. Jurnal Anugerah, 6(1), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.31629/anugerah.v6i1.6423
  10. Peedikayil, J. V., Vijayan, V., & Kaliappan, T. (2023). Teachers’ attitude towards education for sustainable development: A Descriptive research. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE). https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v12i1.23019
  11. Pratt, D., Davies, N., & Connor, D. (2011). The Role of Technology in Teaching and Learning Statistics. New ICMI Study Series, 14, 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1131-0_13
  12. Rahmadi, I. F. (2019). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK): Kerangka Pengetahuan Guru Abad 21. Jurnal of Civic and Education Studies, 6(1), 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7308-0_5
  13. Septiati, E., Hartono, Y., & Hiltrimartin, C. (2023). Desain Pembelajaran Berbasis Bukti Materi Ketaksamaan Segitiga Berdasarkan Teori APOS. Indiktika : Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika, 6(1), 11–24. https://doi.org/10.31851/indiktika.v6i1.13626
  14. Tanudjaya, C. P., & Doorman, M. (2020). Examining higher order thinking in Indonesian lower secondary mathematics classrooms. Journal on Mathematics Education, 11(2), 277–300. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.11.2.11000.277-300
  15. Wicaksono, A. R., Winarno, W. W., Sunyoto, A., & Learning, P. B. (2015). Perancangan Dan Implementasi E-Learning Pendukung Project Based Learning. Seminar Nasional Teknologi Informasi Dan Komunikasi, Sentika, 333–343. Retrived from: https://adoc.pub/perancangan-dan-implementasi-e-learning-pendukung-project-ba.html