Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Open-Ended Ditinjau dari Gaya Belajar

Hana Kholifatul Husniyah, Cholis Sa'dijah

Abstract

Purpose: This research aims to describe students' creative thinking abilities in solving open-ended problems viewed from the perspective of learning styles to support the essential competencies required in the 21st century. Design/methodology/approach: This study utilizes a qualitative approach where data collection was conducted through creative thinking ability tests, learning style assessments, and interviews. The research subjects consisted of 33 tenth-grade students from a senior high school in Malang. Interviews were conducted with subjects from each learning style, ensuring a proportional representation of visual, auditory, and kinaesthetic styles while considering students' communication skills, utilizing instruments that were validated through expert judgment. Findings: Based on the research results, it was found that students with a visual learning style met the criteria for flexibility and novelty. Auditory learners fulfilled the criteria for fluency and flexibility. Conversely, kinaesthetic learners did not meet the criteria for fluency, flexibility, or novelty. Practical implications: Creative thinking skills can be cultivated in students through open-ended problem-solving instruction because learning styles significantly influence an individual's creative thinking capacity. Originality/value: This study provides a specific overview of creative thinking as a fundamental skill for the 21st century based on an analysis of learning styles in the context of solving open-ended problems.


 


Purpose: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa dalam menyelesaikan masalah open-ended ditinjau dari gaya belajar guna mendukung kemampuan yang dibutuhkan di abad 21. Design/methodology/approach: Pendekatan penelitian ini adalah kualitatif di mana pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui tes kemampuan berpikir kreatif, tes gaya belajar, dan wawancara. Subjek penelitian adalah 33 siswa kelas X yang berasal dari salah satu sekolah menengah atas di Kota Malang. Wawancara dilakukan pada subjek di setiap gaya belajar dengan memperhatikan proporsional gaya belajar visual, auditorial, dan kinestetik serta kemampuan komunikasi siswa menggunakan instrumen yang valid melalui proses validasi ahli. Findings: Berdasarkan hasil penelitian diperoleh bahwa siswa bergaya belajar visual memenuhi fleksibilitas dan kebaruan, siswa auditorial memenuhi kefasihan dan fleksibiltas, dan siswa kinestetik tidak memenuhi kefasihan, fleksibilitas, dan kebaruan. Practical implications: Kemampuan berpikir kreatif dapat dibelajarkan kepada siswa melalui pembelajaran penyelesaian masalah open-ended karena gaya belajar dapat mempengaruhi kemampuan berpikir kreatif seseorang. Originality/value: Penelitian ini memberikan gambaran spesifik mengenai kemampuan berpikir kreatif sebagai bagian dari kemampuan yang dibutuhkan di abad 21 berdasarkan tinjauan gaya belajar dalam menyelesaikan masalah open-ended.

Full text article

Generated from XML file

References

A'yun, Z. Q., Juniati, D., & Ismail, I. (2021). The creativity skills of auditory, visual, and kinesthetic learners in solving cube and cuboid problems. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan dan Inovasi Pembelajaran Matematika (JRPIPM), 4(2), 146–159. https://doi.org/10.26740/jrpipm.v4n2.p146-159
Crossref

Aldino, F., Muksar, M., & Hidayanto, E. (2021). Tingkat berpikir kreatif matematis siswa SD bergaya kognitif field independent dalam menyelesaikan soal open ended. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 6(5), 747–754. https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v6i5.14799
Crossref

Atiyah, A., & Nuraeni, R. (2022). Kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis dan self-confidence ditinjau dari kemandirian belajar siswa. Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran Matematika: PowerMathEdu, 1(1), 103–112. https://doi.org/10.31980/powermathedu.v1i1.1920
Crossref

Chislett, V. M., & Chapman, A. (2005). VAK test questionnaire. Businessballs. https://www.businessballs.com/freepdfmaterials/vak_learning_styles_questionnaire.pdf
Crossref

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications Ltd.
Crossref

DePorter, B., & Hernacki, M. (2007). Quantum learning: Membiasakan belajar nyaman dan menyenangkan. Kaifa.

Fitria, C., & Siswono, T. Y. E. (2014). Profil keterampilan berpikir kreatif siswa dalam memecahkan masalah matematika ditinjau dari tipe kepribadian (sanguinis, koleris, melankolis, dan phlegmatis). Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 3(3), 23–32. https://doi.org/10.26740/mathedunesa.v3n3.p%25p
Crossref

Hidajat, F. A. (2021). Students creative thinking profile as a high order thinking in the improvement of mathematics learning. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(3), 1247–1258. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.3.1247
Crossref

Hidayatulloh, M. F., & Julianingsih, D. (2021). Analisis kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal open-ended. Jurnal Riset Pembelajaran Matematika, 3(2), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.55719/jrpm.v3i2.290
Crossref

Huljannah, M., Sa'dijah, C., & Qohar, A. (2018). Profil berpikir kreatif matematis mahasiswa pendidikan guru sekolah dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 3(11), 1428–1433. https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v3i11.11730
Crossref

Irfan, M. (2018). Proses berpikir siswa yang mengalami math-anxiety dalam menyelesaikan masalah sistem persamaan linier dua variabel. KALAMATIKA Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 3(1), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.22236/kalamatika.vol3no1.2018pp27-38
Crossref

Jumadi, J., Perdana, R., Riwayani, & Rosana, D. (2021). The impact of problem-based learning with argument mapping and online laboratory on scientific argumentation skill. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(1), 16–23. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i1.20593
Crossref

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications Ltd.
Crossref

Mukti, A. A. B., & Soedjoko, E. (2021). Kemampuan siswa pada aspek berpikir kreatif ditinjau dari gaya belajar melalui pembelajaran problem posing berbasis open-ended problem. PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional, 4, 26–36. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/prisma/article/view/44955
Crossref

Mulia, A. C., Sa'dijah, C., & Susanto, H. (2024). Implementasi asesmen berbasis open-ended mathematics problems pada siswa SMP yang mendukung Kurikulum Merdeka. JOHME: Journal of Holistic Mathematics Education, 8(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.19166/johme.v8i1.7721
Crossref

OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en
Crossref

OECD. (2024). PISA 2022 results (Volume III): Creative minds, creative schools. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/1739cd30-en
Crossref

Ozrecberoglu, N., Aydın, S., & Aydın, O. (2022). Students’ skills in solving non-routine mathematical problems. Education Quarterly Reviews, 5(2), 446–461. https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1993.05.02.504
Crossref

Partnership for 21st Century Learning. (2019). Framework for 21st century learning. http://static.battelleforkids.org/documents/p21/P21_framework_0816_2pgs.pdf
Crossref

Purwanti, D., Fakhri, J., & Negara, H. S. (2019). Analisis tingkat kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis peserta didik ditinjau dari gaya belajar kelas VII SMP. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 8(1), 91–102. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v8i1.1733
Crossref

Rahayuningsih, S., Sirajuddin, S., & Nasrun, N. (2020). Cognitive flexibility: Exploring students’ problem-solving in elementary school mathematics learning. JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education), 6(1), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v6i1.11630
Crossref

Rusdianti, E. L., Permadi, H., & Sisworo. (2023). Creative thinking abilities of prospective mathematics teachers in solving open-ended trigonometry problem. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 12(1), 1095–1105. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v12i1.6676
Crossref

Sa'dijah, C., Rafiah, H., Gipayana, M., Qohar, A., & Anwar, L. (2016). Asesmen pemecahan masalah open-ended untuk mengukur profil berpikir kreatif matematis siswa berdasar gender. Sekolah Dasar: Kajian Teori dan Praktik Pendidikan, 25(2), 147–159. https://doi.org/10.17977/um009v25i22016p147
Crossref

Samosir, T. I., & Salayan, M. (2023). Pengaruh kemampuan berpikir kreatif dan pemecahan masalah ditinjau dari gaya belajar siswa. Journal of Didactic Mathematics, 4(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.34007/jdm.v4i1.1621
Crossref

Sari, L. M., Sutirna, & Firmansyah, D. (2023). Analisis kemampuan pemahaman konsep matematis berdasarkan gaya belajar siswa SMP. Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif, 6(1), 207–217. https://doi.org/10.51278/learning.v2i4.1793
Crossref

Siswono, T. Y. E. (2016). Berpikir kritis dan berpikir kreatif sebagai fokus pembelajaran matematika. Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika (Senatik 1), 11–16.

Toheri, Winarso, W., & Haqq, A. A. (2020). Where exactly for enhance critical and creative thinking: The use of problem posing or contextual learning. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(2), 877–887. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.2.877
Crossref

Triwibowo, Z., Dwidayati, N. K., & Sugiman, S. (2017). Analysis of mathematical creative thinking ability viewed from students learning styles in seventh grader through Treffinger learning model with open-ended approach. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education, 6(3), 391–399. https://doi.org/10.15294/ujme.v6i3.17987
Crossref

Wijayadi, M., Darmono, P. B., & Kurniasih, N. (2021). Kesulitan siswa gaya belajar kinestetik dalam menyelesaian soal HOTS. SAP (Susunan Artikel Pendidikan), 6(2), 174–179. https://doi.org/10.30998/sap.v6i2.9759
Crossref

Wijayanto, M. T., Purwosetiyono, F. D., & Prasetyowati, D. (2021). Kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa dalam menyelesaikan word problem ditinjau dari gaya belajar siswa. Imajiner: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 3(1), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.26877/imajiner.v3i1.7026
Crossref

Yayuk, E., Purwanto, As’Ari, A. R., & Subanji. (2020). Primary school students’ creative thinking skills in mathematics problem solving. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(3), 1281–1295. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.3.1281
Crossref

Yuliardi, R., Kusumah, Y. S., Nurjanah, N., Juandi, D., & Suparman, S. (2024). Development of a STEM-based digital learning space platform to enhance students’ mathematical creativity in future learning classrooms. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(12), em2545. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15665
Crossref

Zamzam, K. F., Sa'dijah, C., Subanji, & Rahardi, R. (2023). The creative thinking process of prospective teachers in developing assignments. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 23(1), 101–108. https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v23i1.5793
Crossref

Authors

Hana Kholifatul Husniyah
Cholis Sa'dijah
cholis.sadijah.fmipa@um.ac.id (Primary Contact)
Husniyah, H. K., & Sa’dijah, C. (2025). Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Open-Ended Ditinjau dari Gaya Belajar . International Journal of Progressive Mathematics Education, 5(1), 109–124. https://doi.org/10.22236/ijopme.v5i1.18887

Article Details