Article Sidebar

Submitted
May 8, 2025
Accepted
May 31, 2025
Published
May 31, 2025
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 219 Download : 265

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study examines the development and influence of Salafi educational institutions in Indonesia on the national education system, particularly Islamic education. Employing a qualitative approach through literature review, the research traces the origins, classifications, and dissemination strategies of two major Salafi branches: Traditionalist and Reformist. The findings indicate that Salafi educational institutions have grown significantly since the 1980s, driven by financial support from Gulf countries and Middle Eastern alumni networks. Traditionalist Salafi institutions are generally exclusive, emphasizing a literalist-scriptural curriculum focused on Islamic creed (tauhid) while minimizing general education. In contrast, Reformist Salafis such as Muhammadiyah, Persis, and Al-Irsyad integrate religious teachings with modern science and general education. The impact of these institutions is ambivalent—while they offer a structured model of Islamic education, their rigid ideological stance may challenge national values of pluralism and tolerance.

Keywords

Indonesian Salafi Islamic Education Religious Ideology Traditionlist Salafi Reformist Salafi

Article Details

License
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
How to Cite
Afandi, M. R., & Rizqulloh, M. N. (2025). Perkembangan Lembaga Pendidikan Salafi dan Pengaruhnya terhadap Pendidikan di Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 16(01), 31–42. Retrieved from https://journal.uhamka.ac.id/index.php/jpi/article/view/18893
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Abdat, A. H. (2017). Syarah Aqidah Salaf. [n.p.]: Maktabah Muawiyah bin Abi Sufyan.
  2. Adam, H. (2010). Partisipasi anggaran dan kepuasan kerja manajemen Perguruan Tinggi Muhammadiyah se-Indonesia. Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 1(2), 191–206.
  3. Alfian. (1989). Muhammadiyah: The Political Behavior of a Muslim Modernist Organization under Dutch Colonialism. Jakarta: LP3ES.
  4. Al-Irsyad. (n.d.). Perhimpunan Al-Irsyad Al-Islamiyyah. Retrieved April 21, 2018, from https://www.alirsyad.or.id/tentang-al-irsyad
  5. Arif, S. (2018). Islam, Pancasila, dan deradikalisasi: Meneguhkan nilai keindonesiaan. Jakarta: PT Elex Media Komputindo.
  6. Arnez, M. (2009). Dakwah by the pen. Indonesia and the Malay World, 37(107), 45–64.
  7. Azra, A. (2013). Islam Nusantara: Jaringan Global dan Lokal. Bandung: Mizan.
  8. Basya, M. H. (2011). Muhammadiyah scholars and democratic transition: Response on radical Islam movement in post-New Order Indonesia. London: VDM.
  9. Basya, M. H. (2016). Islam, secularity and the state in post-New Order Indonesia: Tensions between neo-modernist and revivalist leaderships in the Muhammadiyah, 1998–2005 (Doctoral dissertation). University of Leeds.
  10. Basya, M. H. (ca. 2017). Pesantren Salafi di Indonesia: Antara idealis dan akomodatif. Tangerang: [n.p.].
  11. Bruinessen, M. van. (2013). Contemporary developments in Indonesian Islam: Explaining the “conservative turn”. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
  12. Burhani, A. N. (2014). Muhammadiyah, Salafism, and the Future of Islamic Reformism in Indonesia. Indonesia and the Malay World, 42(124), 266–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639811.2014.951519
  13. Burhani, A. N. (2016). Fundamentalism and religious dissent: The LPPI’s mission to eradicate the Ahmadiyya in Indonesia. Indonesia and the Malay World, 44(129), 145–164.
  14. Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(3), 297–298.
  15. Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). California: Sage Publications, Inc.
  16. Duderija, A. (2007). Islamic groups and their world-views and identities: Neo-traditional Salafis and progressive Muslims. Arab Law Quarterly, 21(4), 341–363.
  17. Fealy, G. (2004). Islamic Radicalism in Indonesia: The Faltering Revival? In Southeast Asian Affairs.
  18. Fealy, G., & Hooker, V. (2006). Voices of Islam in Southeast Asia: A contemporary sourcebook. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
  19. Federspiel, H. M. (1970). Persatuan Islam: Islamic reform in twentieth century Indonesia. Modern Indonesia Project, Cornell University.
  20. Federspiel, H. M., & Institute of Southeast Asian Studies. (2006). Indonesian Muslim intellectuals of the twentieth century. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
  21. Hasan, N. (2006). Laskar Jihad: Islam, militancy, and the quest for identity in post-New Order Indonesia. Ithaca, NY: Southeast Asia Program Publications, Southeast Asia Program, Cornell University.
  22. Hasan, N. (2007). The Salafi movement in Indonesia: Transnational dynamics and local development. Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East, 27, 83–94.
  23. Hew, W. W. (2018). The art of dakwah: Social media, visual persuasion and the Islamist propagation of Felix Siauw. Indonesia and the Malay World, 46, 61–79.
  24. Hidayat, D. (2012). Gerakan dakwah Salafi di Indonesia pada era reformasi. Masyarakat: Jurnal Sosiologi, 17, 115–133.
  25. Idahram, S. (2018). Sejarah berdarah sekte Salafi Wahabi: Mereka membunuh semuanya, termasuk para ulama. Yogyakarta: CV Global Press.
  26. Irham, I. (2016). Pesantren Manhaj Salafi: Pendidikan Islam model baru di Indonesia. Ulul Albab, 17, 1–18.
  27. Jawwas, Y. (2018). Mulia dengan manhaj Salaf (18th ed.). Bogor: Pustaka At-Taqwa.
  28. Kurzman, C. (Ed.). (2002). Modernist Islam, 1840–1940: A source book. New York: Oxford University Press.
  29. Maher, S. (2017). Salafi-Jihadism: The history of an idea. UK: Penguin Books.
  30. Marlina, L. (2012). Kajian terhadap perkembangan sekolah Muhammadiyah. Ta’dib, 17, 103–138.
  31. Muhammadiyah. (2018, April 20). Majlis dan lembaga. Retrieved April 20, 2018, from http://www.muhammadiyah.or.id/id/content-201-list-majelis-lembaga.html
  32. Mu’arif, A. (2020). Pendidikan Karakter dalam Kurikulum Muhammadiyah. Tarbiyatuna: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 13(1), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.31603/tarbiyatuna.v13i1.3610
  33. Munhanif, A. (2017, March 1). Faham Salafi di Indonesia. Retrieved April 20, 2018, from https://www.benarnews.org/indonesian/berita/indonesia-salafi-03012017155955.html
  34. Munir, M. (2017). Kurikulum Sekolah Muhammadiyah: Integrasi Ilmu dan Agama. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 6(2), 149–160. https://doi.org/10.14421/jpi.2017.62.149-160
  35. Qodir, Z. (2014). Gerakan Salafi radikal dalam konteks Islam Indonesia: Tinjauan sejarah. Islamica: Jurnal Studi Keislaman, 3, 1–15.
  36. Sunarwoto, S. (2015). Contesting religious authority: A study on dakwah radio in Surakarta. Indonesia: [s.n.].
  37. Thohari, H. Y. (2015, May 7). Muhammadiyah berpolitik. Retrieved May 20, 2018, from https://www.republika.co.id/berita/koran/opini-koran/15/05/07/nnyu079-muhammadiyah-berpolitik
  38. Wagemakers, J. (2009). A purist jihadi-Salafi: The ideology of Abu Muhammad al Maqdisi. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, 36(2), 281–297.
  39. Wahid, D. (2012). Challenging religious authority: The emergence of Salafi ustadhs in Indonesia. Journal of Indonesian Islam, 6, 245–264.
  40. Wahid, D. (2014). Nalar santri dalam wacana Islam radikal. Maarif Institute.
  41. Wahid, D. (2015). Nurturing Salafi manhaj: A study of Salafi pesantrens in contemporary Indonesia. Wacana, 15, 367–376.
  42. Wiktorowicz, Q. (2006). Anatomy of the Salafi movement. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 29, 207–239.
  43. Zaenudin, A. (2017, May 27). Mengapa para dai bisa amat populer di media sosial. Retrieved May 27, 2018, from https://tirto.id/mengapa-para-dai-bisa-amat-populer-di-media-sosial-cCox