Main Article Content

Abstract

Evaluation toward the Implementation of Curriculum 2013 : A Qualitative Study on Elementary School Muhammadiyah 5 Jakarta. Thesis. Research and Educational Evaluation Department, Graduate School of Muhammadiyah University of Prof. DR. HAMKA. January 2015. This Research aims to reveal the evaluation toward the Implementation of Curriculum 2013 by using CIPP (Context, Input, Process, Product) model : A Qualitative Study on Elementary School Muhammadiyah 5


Jakarta. The method used is Evaluation Research Method, that is a method which uses  numbers, written statement, oral information and various facts to obtain data which relates to the problem of evaluation toward the implementation of Curriculum 2013. Data collection used documentation, interviews, and observation. Interviews were conducted at five Muhammadiyah Elementary School Principals, Curriculum Staffs and Classroom teachers


Research result concludes that in terms of context, the implementation of Curriculum 2013   in Elementary School Muhammadiyah 5 is clear in its vision, mission and objective. But in term of input, the implementation of Curriculum 2013 is not controlled well yet. It is seen from the input of teachers and employees who are not in accordance with their profession. Some teachers are   classroom teachers who did not graduate from PGSD but from one field of study. The process implementation of Curriculum 2013 is running well, it is in accordance with the procedures established by the government curriculum. There is no   products in the implementation of Curriculum 2013   in Elementary School Muhammadiyah 5 yet, both in academic and non-academic terms. It is very expected for Institutions to pay more attention to the process of recruitment of teachers, therefore the skill of prospective teachers will be in accordance with their profession to gain an optimal learning process. Besides, the institutions is also expected to provide briefing and training to all teachers to be able to master the implementation of curriculum in 2013 correctly and in accordance with the provisions that have been set by the government.

Keywords

Evaluation KTSP Muhammadiyah 5 Islamic Highschool

Article Details

How to Cite
Lismawati, L. (2017). EVALUASI IMPLEMENTASI KURIKULUM TINGKAT SATUAN PENDIDIKAN (KTSP) 2013 PADA PELAJARAN AL-ISLAM DI SD MUHAMMADIYAH 5 JAKARTA. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 7(2), 53-66. Retrieved from https://journal.uhamka.ac.id/index.php/jpi/article/view/178

References

  1. Alwasilah, A. Chaedar. 2009. Pokoknya Kualitatif. Jakarta : Pustaka Jaya
  2. Arikunto, Suharsimi. dan Safruddin Cepi. 2008. Evaluasi Program Pendidikan. Jakarta : Bumi
  3. Aksara
  4. Baraja, Abubakar. 2008. Psikologi Perkembangan. Jakarta : Studia Press Burhanuddin, Yusak. 2005. Administrasi Pendidikan. Bandung : Pustaka Setia Danim, Sudarwan. 2010. Psikologi Pendidikan. Bandung : ALFABETA
  5. Depdiknas. 2002. Panduan Monitoring dan Evaluasi; Buku 3. Jakarta: Depdiknas Dikdasmen
  6. Direktorat SLTP
  7. Depdiknas. 2006. Standar Nasional Pendidikan. Jakarta
  8. Djaali,Pudji Mulyono dan Ramly. 2004. Pengukuran dala Bidang Pendidikan . Jakarta: PPs UNJ
  9. Djamarah, Syaiful Bahri. 2006. Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta : Rineka Cipta
  10. Emzir. 2008. Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan. Jakarta : Raja Grafindo
  11. Gustafson, Fredic G Knirk L.. 1998. Instructional Technology, A systematic Approach to
  12. Educational. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston
  13. Grounlund, Norman E and Robert L. Linn. 1990. Measurement and Evaluation inTeaching. New
  14. York: MacMilan Publishing Company
  15. Hamalik, Oemar. 2008. Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara
  16. Hamalik, Oemar. 2008. Dasar-Dasar Pengembangan Kurikulum, Bandung : Rosda Karya
  17. Hasbullah. 2007. Otonomi Pendidikan. Jakarta : Raja Grafindo Persada
  18. Kusnandar. 2010. Guru Profesional, Implementasi KTSP, Sukses dalam Sertifikasi Guru. Jakarta : Rajawali Pres
  19. Majid. Abdul. 2008. Perencanaan Pembelajaran. Bandung : Rosda Karya Moleong, Lexy J. 2010. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung : Rosdakarya Muhibbinsyah. 2009. Psikologi Pendidikan. Bandung : Rosda Karya
  20. Mulyasa E. 2006. Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan. Bandung: PT Remaja Karya
  21. Mulyasa, E. 2008. Standar Kompetensi dan Sertifikasi Guru. Bandung : Rosda Karya
  22. Mulyono. 2008. Manajemen Administrasi dan Organisasi Pendidikan. Yogyakarta : Arruzz Media
  23. Mutaqin, Zaenal. 2006. Seminar Pelaksanaan KTSP di Sekolah. Bandung: Depdiknas Kota Bandung
  24. Oriondo , Leonard Layola and Eleanor M. Dallo Antonio. 1988. Evaluating Educational Outcomes.
  25. Manila: Rex Book Store
  26. Popham, W. James. 1981. Model Educational Evaluation . New Jersey: Practice Hall Inc
  27. Prayitno. 2004. Dasar-Dasar Bimbingan dan Konseling. Jakarta : Rineka Cipta
  28. Ramayulis. 2001. Metodologi Pengajaran Agama Islam. Jakarta : Kalam Mulia.
  29. Rosyada , Dede. 2004. Paradigma Pendidikan Demokratis, Sebuah Model Pelibatan Masyarakat dalam Penyelenggaraan Pendidikan. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media
  30. Rutman, Leonard. Evaluation Research Methode: A Basic Guide. California: Sage Publication
  31. Salahudin, Mahfudh. 1990. Pengantar Psikologi Pendidikan. Surabaya : Bina Ilmu.
  32. Sudijono, Anas. 2011. Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta : Rajawali Press
  33. Sugiono. 2011. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung : Alfabeta
  34. . 2012. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan RD. Bandung : Alfabeta
  35. Sutomo. 1985. Teknik Penilaian Pendidikan. Surabaya: PT. Bina Ilmu
  36. Wirawan. 2011. Evaluasi teori, model, standar, aplikasi dan profesi. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers