Melampaui sekadar nilai: mengintegrasikan assessment as learning dalam pembelajaran bangun ruang untuk melatih regulasi diri siswa
Abstract
Purpose: This research develops solid geometry instructional materials based on Assessment as Learning (AaL) to transform students into autonomous assessors while addressing deficiencies in learning independence.Design/methodology/approach: Adopting the 4-D development model (limited to Define, Design, and Develop phases), this study involved 24 junior high school students as trial subjects. Data were synthesized through expert validation instruments, practicality observations, and effectiveness tests measuring academic outcomes and student engagement.Findings: Results indicate that the developed toolkit—comprising lesson plans, student worksheets, and self/peer-assessment instruments—exhibits high validity. Field trials further confirm that the materials are both practical and effective in enhancing learning performance and eliciting favorable student responses through structured participatory evaluation.Practical implications: These findings provide a strategic framework for educators to foster metacognition and self-regulated learning by actively involving students in a continuous, internal assessment process.Originality/value: The significance of this study lies in its systematic integration of AaL within solid geometry topics, contributing a novel perspective to the literature on self-evaluation as a primary driver for cognitive autonomy in secondary education.
Purpose: Penelitian ini bertujuan mengembangkan perangkat pembelajaran Bangun Ruang Sisi Datar berbasis Assessment as Learning (AaL) guna mentransformasi peran siswa menjadi asesor mandiri serta mengatasi rendahnya kemandirian belajar pada materi geometri. Design/methodology/approach: Menggunakan model pengembangan 4-D (tahap Define, Design, Develop), penelitian ini melibatkan 24 siswa SMPN 6 Topoyo sebagai subjek uji coba. Data dikumpulkan melalui instrumen validasi ahli, observasi kepraktisan, serta tes efektivitas untuk mengukur capaian belajar dan respon siswa. Findings: Temuan menunjukkan bahwa perangkat yang dihasilkan (RPP, LKPD, dan instrumen penilaian diri/sejawat) memenuhi kriteria validitas tinggi. Produk terbukti praktis dan efektif dalam meningkatkan hasil belajar, sekaligus memicu respon positif siswa melalui aktivitas evaluasi partisipatif yang sistematis. Practical implications: Hasil penelitian ini menyediakan kerangka kerja bagi pendidik untuk melatih metakognisi dan self-regulated learning melalui pelibatan aktif siswa dalam proses penilaian internal yang berkelanjutan. Originality/value: Keunggulan studi ini terletak pada integrasi sistematis AaL dalam materi geometri bangun ruang, memberikan kontribusi baru pada literatur pengembangan evaluasi mandiri sebagai penggerak kemandirian kognitif siswa di jenjang sekolah menengah.
Full text article
References
Crossref
Agustiani, R. (2019). Pembelajaran Matematika Berbasis Alam di TK Sekolah Alam Bandung (Studi Kasus di TK Sekolah Alam Bandung Tahun Ajaran 2018-2019). Edukid, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.17509/edukid.v15i1.20152
Crossref
Ayu, D., Nonik, L., & Zuhrotun, I. (2021). Profil Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Tulis Siswa Kelas VII Pada Materi Bangun Datar Segi Empat Profil Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Tulis Siswa Kelas VII Pada Materi Bangun Datar Segi Empat. International Journal of Progressive Mathematics Education, 1(3), 218-233. https://doi.org/10.22236/ijopme.v1i3.7621
Crossref
Bråting, K. (2023). From Symbolic Manipulations to Stepwise Instructions: A Curricular Comparison of Swedish School Algebra Content over the Past 40 Years. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 67(2), 225-239. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2021.2006301
Crossref
Eikeland, I., & Ohna, S. E. (2022). Differentiation in education: a configurative review. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 8(3), 157-170. https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2022.2039351
Crossref
Engelbrecht, J., Borba, M. C., & Kaiser, G. (2023). Will we ever teach mathematics again in the way we used to before the pandemic? ZDM - Mathematics Education, 55(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-022-01460-5
Crossref
Essien, A. A., & Adler, J. (2025). Language in mathematics education in Africa: chronicling recent growth and leadership in the field. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-025-01698-9
Crossref
Fan, L., Luo, J., Xie, S., Zhu, F., & Li, S. (2022). Chinese students' access, use and perceptions of ICTs in learning mathematics: findings from an investigation of Shanghai secondary schools. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 54(3), 611-624. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-022-01363-5
Crossref
Galbraith, P., & Stillman, G. (2006). A framework for identifying student blockages during transitions in the modelling process. ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education, 38(2), 143-162. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02655886
Crossref
Geiger, V., Gal, I., & Graven, M. (2023). The connections between citizenship education and mathematics education. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 55(5), 923-940. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01521-3
Crossref
Hamid, A., & Juhari, A. (2025). Pola Koneksi Matematis Siswa dengan Tingkat Kemampuan Matematika yang Berbeda pada Materi Sistem Persamaan Linear Dua Variabel. International Journal of Progressive Mathematics Education, 5(1), 55-57. https://doi.org/10.22236/ijopme.v5i1.18649
Crossref
Hemmi, K., Bråting, K., & Lepik, M. (2021). Curricular approaches to algebra in Estonia, Finland and Sweden-a comparative study. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 23(1), 49-71. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2020.1740857
Crossref
Ibrahim, A., & Alhosani, N. (2020). Impact of language and curriculum on student international exam performances in the United Arab Emirates. Cogent Education, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1808284
Crossref
Kyei-Akuoko, C., Mensah, R. O., Kuusongno, D. D., Ebow Yalley, C., & Darko Amponsah, K. (2025). Evaluation of blended learning: challenges, academic performance shifts, and the pros and cons in a selected Technical University. Cogent Arts and Humanities, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2435713
Crossref
Mahmood, S. (2021). Instructional Strategies for Online Teaching in COVID-19 Pandemic. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 3(1), 199-203. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.218
Crossref
Makramalla, M., Coles, A., le Roux, K., & Wagner, D. (2025). Mathematics education for sustainable futures: a strengths-based survey of the field to invite further research action. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-025-10389-x
Crossref
Mann, L. C., & Walshaw, M. (2019). Mathematics Anxiety in Secondary School Female Students: Issues, Influences and Implications. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 54(1), 101-120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40841-019-00126-3
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40841-019-00126-3">Crossref
Mayasari, D., Natsir, I., Pagiling, S. L., & Taufik, A. R. (2021). Developing Student Worksheet-Based Cooperative Learning Model for Improving Problem Solving Ability. Journal of Honai Math, 4(2), 161-172. https://doi.org/10.30862/jhm.v4i2.195
Crossref
Mellone, M., Pacelli, T., & Liljedahl, P. (2021). Cultural transposition of a thinking classroom: to conceive possible unthoughts in mathematical problem solving activity. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 53(4), 785-798. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01256-z
Crossref
Moon, K. (2019). PRESERVICE TEACHERS? UNDERSTANDING OF TWO-VARIABLE INEQUALITIES: APOS THEORY. Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of PME-NA, 686-694.
Nakawa, N., & Kosaka, M. (2025). Aligning Cross-Curricular Inquiry-Based High School Textbooks with Curriculum Guidelines. ZDM - Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-025-01701-3
Crossref
Ndagijimana, J. B., Mukama, E., Lakin, L., Khan, S., Munyaruhengeri, J. P. A., Dushimimana, J. C., Habimana, O., Manirakiza, P., Musengimana, J., & Mushimiyimana, H. (2024). Contributions of GeoGebra software within the socio-cultural proximity on enhancing students' conceptual understanding of mathematics. Cogent Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2436296
Crossref
Pepin, B., Kohanová, I., & Lada, M. (2025). Developing Pre-Service Teachers' Capacity for Lesson Planning with the Support of Curriculum Resources. ZDM - Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-025-01685-0
Crossref
Samosir, C. M., Herman, T., Prabawanto, S., Melani, R., & Mefiana, S. A. (2024). Students' Difficulty in Understanding Problems in the Contextual Problem-Solving Process. PRISMA, 13(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.35194/jp.v13i1.3726
Crossref
Scheiner, T. (2023). Shifting the ways prospective teachers frame and notice student mathematical thinking: from deficits to strengths. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 114(1), 35-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-023-10235-y
Crossref
Schukajlow, S., Leiss, D., Pekrun, R., Blum, W., Müller, M., & Messner, R. (2012). Teaching methods for modelling problems and students' task-specific enjoyment, value, interest and self-efficacy expectations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 79(2), 215-237.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-011-9341-2. Crossref
Slamet, S., Hendriana, B., & Supiat. (2025). Mengungkap Perspektif Siswa: Peran Deep Learning dalam Visualisasi Konsep dan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika. International Journal of Progressive Mathematics Education, 5(1), 225-237. https://doi.org/10.22236/ijopme.v5i1.19310
Crossref
Tamami, M., Santi, V. M., & Aziz, T. A. (2021). Pengembangan Buku Ajar Matematika dengan Pendekatan Contextual Teaching And Learning (CTL) pada Materi Statistika untuk Siswa Kelas XI SMK Bisnis dan Manajemen. International Journal of Progressive Mathematics Education, 1(3), 207-217. https://doi.org/10.22236/ijopme.v1i3.7620
Crossref
Tamami, M., Santi, V. M., & Aziz, T. A. (2023). Pengembangan Buku Ajar Matematika dengan Pendekatan Contextual Teaching And Learning (CTL) pada Materi Statistika untuk Siswa Kelas XI SMK Bisnis dan Manajemen. International Journal of Progressive Mathematics Education, 3(1), 24-34. https://doi.org/10.22236/ijopme.v3i1.7620
Crossref
Ukobizaba, F., Nizeyimana, G., & Mukuka, A. (2021). Assessment Strategies for Enhancing Students' Mathematical Problem-solving Skills: A Review of Literature. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(3), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9728
Crossref
Van Vooren, C., Lai, C., Ledger, S., Villaverde, Á. B., & Steffen, V. (2013). Additional Language Teaching and Learning in International Baccalaureate Primary Years Program Schools. 79. https://www.ibo.org/globalassets/publications/ib-research/additionallanguagefinalreport.pdf
Višňovská, J., & Cortina, J. L. (2025). Curriculum and mathematical coherence: exploring the tensions in teaching and learning number. ZDM - Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-025-01706-y
Crossref
Zamista, A. A., & Deswita, P. (2023). Perceptions of Indonesian teachers on the implementation of "Merdeka" Curriculum. Wiyata Dharma: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 11(1), 13-25. https://doi.org/10.30738/wd.v11i1.15611
Crossref
Authors

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.