Article Sidebar

Submitted
March 24, 2025
Published
June 28, 2025
Keywords:
    Flat-sided Geometric Geometry, Geometry, Mathematical Reasoning, Conceptual Understanding Bangun Ruang Sisi Datar, Geometri, Penalaran Matematika, Pemahaman Konseptual

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to analyze students' mathematical reasoning in solving problems related to flat-walled three-dimensional shapes, examined through the lens of their mathematical proficiency levels. Design/methodology/approach: The research employs a qualitative descriptive approach. Data were gathered through assessments and interviews conducted with three subjects representing high, moderate, and low mathematical abilities. Findings: The results indicate that robust mastery of material correlates positively with effective reasoning, as evidenced by the high-ability subject meeting all reasoning indicators. Conversely, subjects with moderate and low abilities experienced significant difficulties due to a deficit in basic conceptual understanding, thereby limiting their capacity to identify procedural steps, integrate concepts, and construct coherent arguments. Practical implications: These findings serve as a reference for developing adaptive mathematics learning strategies oriented toward conceptual comprehension to mitigate the tendency of students merely memorizing formulas. Originality/value: This research contributes a profound overview of reasoning characteristics across various ability levels, specifically within the context of flat-walled geometry, to foster logical and systematic thinking skills.


 


Purpose: Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis penalaran matematika siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal bangun ruang sisi datar, ditinjau berdasarkan kemampuan matematika siswa. Design/methodology/approach:Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan deskriptif kualitatif. Data dikumpulkan melalui tes dan wawancara kepada tiga subjek dengan tingkat kemampuan tinggi, sedang, dan rendah. Findings: Hasil menunjukkan bahwa penguasaan materi yang kuat berkorelasi positif dengan penalaran efektif, di mana subjek berkemampuan tinggi menguasai semua indikator penalaran. Sebaliknya, subjek berkemampuan sedang dan rendah mengalami kesulitan signifikan akibat defisit pemahaman konsep dasar, yang membatasi kemampuan mereka dalam mengidentifikasi langkah, mengintegrasikan konsep, dan menyusun argumen. Practical implications: Hasil ini menjadi acuan untuk pengembangan pembelajaran matematika yang adaptif dan berorientasi pada pemahaman konseptual untuk mengatasi kecenderungan siswa yang hanya menghafalkan rumus. Originality/value: Kontribusi penelitian ini memberikan gambaran mendalam tentang karakteristik penalaran pada berbagai tingkat kemampuan dalam materi bangun ruang sisi datar guna mendukung kemampuan berpikir logis dan sistematis.

Full text article

Generated from XML file

References

Tentu, ini adalah daftar referensi Anda yang telah dirapikan sesuai APA Style Edisi ke-7 dengan tambahan tautan Crossref di bawah setiap referensi yang memiliki DOI.

References
Alim Syahri, A. (2023). Kemampuan penalaran matematis ditinjau dari gaya kognitif siswa kelas VIII. Jurnal Penalaran dan Riset Matematika (PRISMA), 2(1). https://doi.org/10.62388/prisma.v2i1.225
Crossref

Andono, J., Nugroho, B. P., & Handayani, R. (2022). Analisis kesulitan belajar siswa dalam mata pelajaran matematika pada materi program linear kelas X. International Journal of Progressive Mathematics Education, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.22236/ijopme.v2i2.8900
Crossref

Bintoro, H. S., Walid, & Mulyono. (2021). The spatial thinking process of the field-independent students based on action-process-object-schema theory. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(4), 1807–1823. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.4.1807
Crossref

Dilling, F., Witzke, I., Hörnberger, K., & Trgalová, J. (2024). Co-designing teaching with digital technologies: A case study on mixed pre-service and in-service mathematics teacher design teams. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 56(4), 667–680. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-024-01623-6
Crossref

Faradeni Imkhala, M. (2024). Analysis of mathematical reasoning ability on quadratic function material of junior high school students in terms of initial mathematical ability (IMA). Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 6(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.36706/jls.v6i1.7
Crossref

Galbraith, P., & Stillman, G. (2006). A framework for identifying student blockages during transitions in the modelling process. ZDM – International Journal on Mathematics Education, 38(2), 143–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02655886
Crossref

Grugeon-Allys, B., & Pilet, J. (2024). The algebraic learning of middle school students’ evolution during a school year: A statistical large-scale study based on results in mathematics didactics. Educational Studies in Mathematics. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-024-10347-z
Crossref

Hadi, S., & Marzuki, A. D. (2021). Kemampuan penalaran matematika mahasiswa dalam pembelajaran matematika SD. Jurnal Ilmiah Global Education (JIGE), 2(2), 161–165. https://doi.org/10.55681/jige.v2i2.121
Crossref

Izzah, K. H., & Azizah, M. (2019). Analisis kemampuan penalaran siswa dalam pemecahan masalah matematika siswa kelas IV. Indonesian Journal of Educational Research and Review, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.23887/ijerr.v2i2.17629
Crossref

Johnston-Wilder, S., Lee, C., & Mackrell, K. (2021). Addressing mathematics anxiety through developing resilience: Building on self-determination theory. Creative Education, 12(9), 2098–2115. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2021.129161
Crossref

Kusumaningtyas, N., Nengah Parta, I., & Susanto, H. (2022). Kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa dalam memecahkan masalah matematika pada saat pembelajaran daring. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(1), 107–119. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v6i1.1019
Crossref

Mega Sofyana, U., & Kusuma, A. B. (2018). Upaya meningkatkan kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa menggunakan pembelajaran generative pada kelas VII SMP Muhammadiyah Kaliwiro. Jurnal Penelitian Didaktik Matematika (Kontinu), 2(2), 14–29. https://doi.org/10.30595/kontinu.v2i1.2387
Crossref

Mellone, M., Pacelli, T., & Liljedahl, P. (2021). Cultural transposition of a thinking classroom: To conceive possible unthoughts in mathematical problem solving activity. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 53(4), 785–798. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01256-z
Crossref

Raharani, F. A.-N., Junaedi, I., & Dewi, N. R. (2024). Meta synthesis: Mathematical literacy reviewed from gender in junior high school students. Prima: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 8(2), 478–492. https://doi.org/10.31000/prima.v8i2.11384
Crossref

Roos, H., & Bagger, A. (2024). Ethical dilemmas and professional judgment as a pathway to inclusion and equity in mathematics teaching. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 56(3), 435–446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01540-0
Crossref

Saida, A., & Ikram, M. (2021). Analysis of students’ creative thinking in solving cuboid problems. International Journal of Progressive Mathematics Education, 1(2), 104–116. https://doi.org/10.22236/ijopme.v1i2.7307
Crossref

Salam, M., Hasnawati, H., Andini, I. A. P., Suhar, S., & Lambertus, L. (2023). Analisis kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa ditinjau dari kemampuan awal. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 12(2), 2351–2364. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v12i2.7448
Crossref

Setyo, A., Lestari, B., Nusantara, T., Irawan, E. B., & Daniel, T. (2018). Imitating failures in communicating solution of mathematical problem solving of elementary. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 3(1), 85–97.
(Tautan URL digunakan sebagai pengganti DOI)
Crossref

Shimizu, Y., & Kang, H. (2025). Research on classroom practice and students’ errors in mathematics education: A scoping review of recent developments for 2018–2023. ZDM – Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-025-01704-0
Crossref

Siti Norhidayah. (2023). Mathematical reasoning ability as a tool to improve mathematical literacy. Hipotenusa: Journal of Mathematical Society, 5(2), 147–158. https://doi.org/10.18326/hipotenusa.v5i2.565
Crossref

Sorvo, R., Koponen, T., Viholainen, H., Aro, T., Räikkönen, E., Peura, P., Dowker, A., & Aro, M. (2017). Math anxiety and its relationship with basic arithmetic skills among primary school children. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(3), 309–327. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12151
Crossref

Vamvakoussi, X. (2017). Using analogies to facilitate conceptual change in mathematics learning. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 49(4), 497–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0857-5
Crossref

Vebrian, R., Putra, Y. Y., Saraswati, S., & Wijaya, T. T. (2021). Kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal literasi matematika kontekstual. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 10(4), 2602–2612. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v10i4.4369
Crossref

Authors

Andika Setyo Budi Lestari
andikalestari123@gmail.com (Primary Contact)
Siti Arifah
Budi Lestari, A. S., & Arifah, S. (2025). Menyingkap Karakteristik Penalaran Matematis Siswa dalam Pemecahan Masalah Geometri Ruang : Tinjauan Berdasarkan Kategori Kemampuan Matematika. International Journal of Progressive Mathematics Education, 5(1), 256–269. https://doi.org/10.22236/ijopme.v5i1.18643

Article Details

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Themes by Openjournaltheme.comThemes by Openjournaltheme.com