Article Sidebar

Download
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)
Statistic
Read Counter : 83 Download : 103

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Risk management in educational institutions plays an important role because the educational environment will always change and become increasingly complex. Risk management can provide support to educational institutions to identify, assess and manage risks in a systematic and structured way. House of Risk (HOR) is an approach used to manage risk and focuses on formulating preventive actions and handling the causes of risk, by combining FMEA and HOQ principles. This research aims to design an architectural requirements analysis and risk management system interface design using the design thinking stages. This research produces an architectural design, software requirements, and interface design for a higher education risk management system. The user interface design was tested using usability testing with a score of 87.5, which shows that the interface design is useful for various system actors. The results of this research can be a reference for further research in implementing the creation of a HOR-based risk management system in web-based educational institutions.

Keywords

higher education risk management house of risk user interface design requirement analysis

Article Details

How to Cite
Intan Dzikria, & Nabila Amanda Maharani. (2024). Analisis Kebutuhan Arsitektur dan Desain Antarmuka Sistem Manajemen Risiko Berbasis Penelitian House of Risk pada Institusi Pendidikan. Jurnal Teknik Informatika Dan Komputer, 3(1), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.22236/jutikom.v3i1.14535
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Anindyanari, O. S., & Puspitasari, N. B. (2023). Analisis dan Mitigasi Risiko Rantai Pasok Menggunakan Metode House of Risk pada PT XYZ. Industrial Engineering Online Journal, 12(1), [Online]. Available: https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/ieoj/article/view/37406%0Ahttps://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/ieoj/article/download/37406/28433
  2. BAN-PT. (2019). Akreditasi Perguruan Tinggi Kriteria dan Prosedur 3.0. Jakarta. p. 18.
  3. Bila, D. S., & Indah, D. R. (2023). Perancangan Ulang UI-UX Desain Website BKKBN Provinsi Sumatera Selatan dengan Metode Design Thinking. KLIK: Kajian Ilmiah Informatika dan Komputer, 3(6), 746-753. doi: 10.30865/klik.v3i6.870.
  4. Boonyanusith, W., & Jittamai, P. (2019). Blood supply chain risk management using house of risk model. Walailak Journal of Science and Technology (WJST), 16(8), 573-591. doi: 10.48048/wjst.2019.3472.
  5. Budiarto, R. (2017). Manajemen risiko keamanan sistem informasi menggunakan metode fmea dan iso 27001 pada organisasi xyz. CESS (Journal of Computer Engineering System and Science), 2(2), 48-58.
  6. Geofanny, G. K. (2022). Sistem manajemen risiko berbasis iso 31000: 2018 di pt. Bawen mediatama. JATISI (Jurnal Teknik Informatika dan Sistem Informasi), 9(4), 2870-2878. [Online]. Available: http://jurnal.mdp.ac.id
  7. Ilham, H., Wijayanto, B., & Rahayu, S. P. (2021). Analysis and Design of User Interface/User Experience With the Design Thinking Method in the Academic Information System of Jenderal Soedirman University. Jurnal Teknik Informatika (Jutif), 2(1), 17-26. doi: 10.20884/1.jutif.2021.2.1.30.
  8. Istiningrum, A. A. (2011). Implementasi penilaian risiko dalam menunjang pencapaian tujuan instansi pendidikan. Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi Indonesia, 9(2), pp. 16–31, Accessed: Apr. 15, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jpakun/article/view/963/773
  9. Magdalena, R., & Vannie, V. (2019). Analisis risiko supply chain dengan model house of risk (HOR) pada PT Tatalogam Lestari. J@ ti Undip: Jurnal Teknik Industri, 14(2), 53-62.
  10. Nugraha, U. (2016, May). Manajemen risiko sistem informasi pada perguruan tinggi menggunakan kerangka kerja nist sp 800-300. Seminar Nasional Telekomunikasi dan Informatika (SELISIK 2016), Universitas Pasundan.
  11. Nyoman Pujawan, I., & Geraldin, L. H. (2009). House of risk: a model for proactive supply chain risk management. Business Process Management Journal, 15(6), 953-967. doi: 10.1108/14637150911003801.
  12. Pradesa, H. A., Purba, C. O., & Priatna, R. (2021). Menilai risiko dari organisasi yang bertransformasi: pelajaran terbaik untuk penguatan akuntabilitas pendidikan tinggi di Indonesia. Jurnal Akuntabilitas Manajemen Pendidikan, 9(2), 146-158. [Online]. Available: https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jamp/article/view/40104/16383
  13. Ruzic-Dimitrijevic, L., & Dakic, J. (2014). The risk management in higher education institutions. Online Journal of Applied Knowledge Management, 2(1), 137-152.
  14. Vorst, C. R., Priyarsono, D. S., and Budiman, A. (2018). Manajemen Risiko Berbasis SNI ISO 31000, Pertama. Jakarta. [Online]. Available: https://perpustakaan.bsn.go.id
  15. Wahyudi, I., Alim, M. N., Malia, E., & Dewi, I. O. (2021). Budaya organisasi dan sistem pengendalian manajemen pada perguruan tinggi. KABILAH: Journal of Social Community, 6(2), 126-140. [Online]. Available: http://ejournal.kopertais4.or.id/madura/index.php/kabilah/article/view/5408
  16. Wibowo, D. A., & Ahyudanari, E. (2021). Application of house of risk (HOR) models for risk mitigation of procurement in the Balikpapan Samarinda Toll Road Project. IPTEK Journal of Proceedings Series, (1), 172-177.