Manajemen Risiko Bencana Gempa Bumi Berbasis Analytical Hierarchy Process Di Wilayah Rawan Gempa Bumi: Studi Kasus Provinsi Banten

Rahmad Gunawan; Brantas Suharyo G; Imer HPS; Ima Damayanti; Hotma RS; Purnomo Yusgiantoro; I Wayan Medio

doi:10.22236/jgel.v9i2.18576

Rahmad Gunawan, Brantas Suharyo G, Imer HPS, Ima Damayanti, Hotma RS, Purnomo Yusgiantoro, I Wayan Medio

https://doi.org/10.22236/jgel.v9i2.18576

Issue
Vol. 9 No. 2 (2025): Edisi Bulan Juli

Submitted
March 18, 2025

Published
July 24, 2025

Keywords:

Risk Management, Earthquake Disasters, Banten Province

PDF

Abstract

Earthquake disasters are feared by many people, especially people who live in disaster-prone areas such as coasts, mountains and other vulnerable areas. The physical threat posed by earthquake disasters, the psychological and economic impacts arising from loss of life, destruction of property, and social disruption are also enormous. Disaster risk management is important because it is expected to minimize threats, reduce vulnerability and increase the capacity of threatened areas. This research is to find the best alternative in strategic decision making that can be used in implementing earthquake disaster risk management with variable factors of danger, vulnerability and increasing community resilience. This research uses a qualitative method which processes the data through the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) with a case study of earthquake-prone areas in Banten Province. The research sites were carried out in Serang Regency, Cilegon Regency, Pandeglang Regency and Lebak Regency, Banten Province, which are earthquake-prone areas. Improving earthquake disaster management infrastructure is a top priority in reducing risks due to earthquake disasters because it can minimize threats, reduce vulnerability and increase the capacity of threatened areas, especially in the Banten Province area by improving the quality of public facilities, evacuation facilities and infrastructure as well as regulations regarding improving the quality of buildings. residences and industries that are standardized to be earthquake resistant.

Full text article

Generated from XML file

References

Aphang Suhendra. (2022). Kajian Risiko Bencana Multi Bahaya di Magetan. Jurnal Bencana Geologi dan Lingkungan, 1(1), 12-23.

Arif Ismul Hadi. (2021). Pemetaan Potensi Kerentanan Gempa Bumi di Bengkulu. Jurnal Bencana Geologi, 8(1), 34-45.

Ayuli, E. (2021). Pemetaan Risiko Gempa Bumi di Wilayah Tapanuli Selatan Menggunakan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) dan Geographic Information System (GIS). Jurnal Geografi, 25(2), 124-136.

Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana (BNPB). (2022). Data Bencana Indonesia. [Sumber resmi].
Dessy Triana. (2021). Manajemen Resiko Bencana Gempa Bumi dan Tsunami. Jurnal Ilmu Kesehatan Masyarakat, 12(1), 45-56.

Fuchs, S., & Oktari, R. S. (2016). Vulnerability to Natural Hazards in Indonesia: Challenges for Social Protection. In M. Moench & R. Shaw (Eds.), Integrated Disaster Risk Reduction: Perspectives from the Asia-Pacific Region (pp. 83-96). Springer.

Ilham Nurfalah. (2022). Evaluasi Rencana Tata Ruang Wilayah Berbasis Potensi Bencana Gempa Bumi. Jurnal Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota, 33(1), 45-58.

Kartika, Y., & Nurhayati, E. (2019). Evaluasi Peningkatan Kerentanan dan Resiliensi Pascabencana di Indonesia. Jurnal Tata Kelola dan Manajemen Publik, 8(2), 123-132.

Mileti, D. S. (1999). Disasters by Design: A Reassessment of Natural Hazards in the United States. Joseph Henry Press.

Muta’ali, L. (2014). Manajemen Resiko Bencana. Penerbit Gadjah Mada University Press.

Puspitasari, A. E., Prabu, D., Bima, S., & Dewi, T. P. (2018). Mitigasi bencana berbasis kearifan lokal di Desa Tieng , Kabupaten Wonosobo. Jurnal Geografi Lingkungan Tropik, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.7454/jglitrop.v2i2.51

Putra, I. P., Sarwa, W., & Sinambela, M. (2024). Mitigasi Bencana Gempa Bumi dengan Integrasi Analisis Geofisika dan Data Mining. Geosfera: Jurnal Penelitian Geografi, 3(2), 121–129.

Ramadhani, D., Hariyanto, T., & Arjosari, K. K. (2022). Penerapan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process ( AHP ) dalam Pemetaan Potensi Banjir Berbasis Sistem Informasi Geografis ( Studi Kasus : Kota Malang , Jawa Timur ). Geoid, 17(1), 72–80.

Raditya. (2019). Kerentanan Gedung di DKI Terhadap Ancaman Gempa Bumi. Jurnal Ilmiah Rekayasa dan Manajemen Sipil, 2(1), 1-8.

Rinaldi. (2022). Pembuatan Peta Zonasi Resiko Bencana Gempa di Lombok. Jurnal Geologi dan Bencana Alam, 4(2), 87-100.

Ruddin, F., Nurhabibi, P., & Saputra, B. (2022). Persepsi Risiko Bencana Pada Mahasiswa di Kota Padang Ditinjau dari Pengalaman dan Variabel Demografis. Jurnal Kawistara.

Saaty, T. L. (1994). Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory with the Analytic Hierarchy Process. RWS Publications.

Sa’adah, N. (2025). Penerapan Metode Analytic Hierarchy Process ( AHP ) pada Proses Mitigasi Bencana : Narrative Literatur Review Penerapan Metode Analytic Hierarchy Process ( AHP ) pada Proses Mitigasi Bencana : Narrative Literatur Review. Neptunus: Jurnal Ilmu Komputer Dan Teknologi Informasi, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.61132/neptunus.v3i1.703

Setiowati, A. R., Sabri, L. M., & Sukmono, A. (2023). analisis tingkat risiko tsunami kota ambon denganmetode analytical hierarchy process (AHP). Jurnal Geodesi Undip, 12(1).

Suryo Atmojo, & Muhandis, I. (2019). Sistem informasi geografis bencana gempa bumi dengan pendekatan pga untuk mitigasi bencana. Jurnal Ilmiah Edutic, 6(1), 10–14.

Smith, K. (2013). Environmental Hazards: Assessing Risk and Reducing Disaster. Routledge.

Tiodora, A. (2017). Mengukur Resiko dan Kerentanan Bencana: Pendekatan Teori dan Praktik. Penerbit Erlangga.decision making: A simulation comparison of select methods. European Journal of Operational Research, 107(3), 507-529.