Bureaucratic Reform Policy Strategy Using The Cipp Model For The Improvement Of Public Services In Kemenko-Polhukam
Article Sidebar
-
Bureaucratic Reform, Strategy, Obstacles, CIPP model
Abstract
This study aims to evaluate bureaucratic reform strategies in organizational units within the Coor- dinating Ministry of Politics, Law and Secutiry (Kemenko Polhukam). Bureaucratic Reformation has the main objective of realizing world-class governance characterized by the implementation of effective, efficient, accountable, transparent governance, clean from collusion, corruption and nepo- tism practices or clean government, so that can ultimately improve employees' performances related to the tasks and functions of the Kemenko Polhukam which are synchronization and coordination of planning, drafting and implementing policies in the fields of politics, law and security. One area of reform that is quite important to improve is public services, especially in the current era of regional autonomy which provides opportunities for regions to innovate, creative, and create the best models for achieving quality improvement for the community. The research methodology used in this study was qualitative research that resulted descriptive data by using the CIPP (Contexts, Input, Process and Product) evaluation model. The results showed that bureaucratic reform in the Coordinating Ministry for Politics and Security was quite good, which increased from the previous year as much as 6.1%. Several bureaucratic strategies were implemented between changing the management, ar- ranging the laws, arranging organization and governance, structuring the HR management system, strengthening supervision, strengthening public accountability teams, improving the quality of public services, monitoring and evaluating the related units.
Full text article
References
Ahmad Nuril. (2018). Bureaucratic Reform City Government.
Creswell, J. (2003). Research design: Quali- tative, quantitative, and mixed meth- ods approaches. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Creswell, J. (2010). Research Design; The Qualitative Approach, Qualitative, And Mixed. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pe- lajar.
Creswell, J. W. and Plano Clark, V. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Effendi, Sofian. (2009). Bureaucratic Re- form Agenda that is responsive, ef- fective and efficient.
Haniah Hanafie. (2014). The Strategy Of The Reform Of The Bureaucracy. UIN Jakarta.
Kurniawan, Agung. (2009). The Transfor- mation Of Bureaucracy, Yogyakarta: Universitas AtmaJaya.
Manting, Lollong. (2017). The Analysis Of The Implementation Of Standards Operating Procedures Of Super- vising Community In The Reform Of Bureaucracy As Well As Their Impact On The Performance Of A Correctional Hall (Balai Correction- al Case Study Klas I Jakarta Barat); EDUKA Jurnal Pendidikan, Hukum dan Bisnis Vol.1 No. V Desember 2017 ISSN: 2505-5406.
Santosa, Pandji. (2008). Public administra- tion, theory, and application of Good Governance. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.
Sumarto, Hetifah. (2009). Inovation, Parti- sipation, and Good Governance. In- novative initiatives and Partisipasif in Indonesia. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
Yusriadi and Misnawati. (2017). The Reform Of The Bureaucracy In The Public Service (The Study Of Integrated Service Of One Door). Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Administrasi Publik Volume 7 Nomor 2 Juli – Desember 2017. Hal 99-108 p-ISSN: 2086-6364, e-ISSN:2549-7499 Homepage: http://ojs.
unm.ac.id/index.php/iap/index
Zuhro, Siti. R. (2010). Good Governance and Bureaucratic Reform In Indone- sia; Jurnal Penelitian Politik ejour- nal.politik.lipi.go.id/index.php/jpp/ article/view/507