How Do Audit Capacity Stress Affect Audit Quality? The Mediating Mechanism of Due Professional Care
Abstract
This study aims to investigate whether due professional care mediates the relationship between audit capacity stress and audit quality. A quantitative approach was applied using survey data collected from 105 auditors working in Jakarta, Indonesia. Hypotheses were tested using the Hayes’ PROCESS Macro (Model 4) to test direct and indirect effects. The results indicate that audit capacity stress positively influences due professional care, suggesting a compensatory discipline effect whereby increased pressure stimulates greater auditor vigilance. Due professional care, in turn, has a significant positive effect on audit quality. Mediation analysis further reveals that due professional care partially mediates the relationship between audit capacity stress and audit quality, implying that heightened diligence can mitigate some adverse effects of stress, although excessive workload may still impair quality through other behavioral mechanisms such as fatigue or distraction. Theoretically, this study contributes to behavioral auditing literature by identifying due professional care as a key cognitive pathway linking stress and quality. Practically, the findings highlight the importance for audit firms to balance workload demands with effective supervision to sustain audit quality, particularly during peak audit periods.
Full text article
References
Christensen, B. E., Newton, N. J., & Wilkins, M. S. (2021). How do team workloads and team staffing affect the audit? Archival evidence from U.S. audits. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 92, 101225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2021.101225
Francis, J. R. (2023). Going big, going small: A perspective on strategies for researching audit quality. The British Accounting Review, 55(2), 101167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2022.101167
Hyatt, T. A., Prawitt, D. F., & Stubbs, K. M. (2024). Reduced audit quality acts: A review and organizational model. International Journal of Auditing, 28(2), 288–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12331
Lambert, T. A., Jones, K. L., Brazel, J. F., & Showalter, D. S. (2017). Audit time pressure and earnings quality: An examination of accelerated filings. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 58, 50–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2017.03.003
Persellin, J. S., Schmidt, J. J., Vandervelde, S. D., & Wilkins, M. S. (2019). Auditor perceptions of audit workloads, audit quality, and job satisfaction. Accounting Horizons, 33(4), 95–117. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-52488
Prihantini, F. N., Januarti, I., & Darsono. (2024). A literature review on work stress and audit quality reduction behavior: Trend and future challenges. Journal of Accounting and Investment, 25(3), 954–970. https://doi.org/10.18196/jai.v25i3.22055
Sari, A. F. K., & Fakhriyyah, D. D. (2024). Due professional care and audit quality: Assessing the influence of time budget pressure, accountability, and auditor experience. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Dan Bisnis, 19(1), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.24843/JIAB.2024.v19.i01.p02
Singh, R., Persellin, J. S., & Smith, E. (2022). Busy auditors, financial reporting timeliness and quality. The British Accounting Review, 54(3), 101080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2022.101080
Smith, K. J., & Emerson, D. J. (2017). An analysis of the relation between resilience and reduced audit quality within the role stress paradigm. Advances in Accounting, 37, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2017.04.003
Smith, K. J., Emerson, D. J., & Boster, C. R. (2018). An examination of reduced audit quality practices within the beyond the role stress model. Managerial Auditing Journal, 33(8/9), 736–759. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-07-2017-1611
Sumartono, Ermawati, Y., & Rorong, T. M. (2022). Influence of experience and professional skepticism on audit judgement of government external auditors. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Auditing Indonesia, 26(2), 89–99. https://doi.org/10.20885/jaai.vol26.iss2.art10
Suzuki, M., & Takada, T. (2024). Audit quality and engagement partner busyness: The role of internal resource allocation. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 51(5–6), 1046–1083. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.12739
Thuneibat, A. A., & AlHalaseh, M. A. (2023). Audit quality between share price and liquidity regarding investor’s decision. Journal of Governance & Regulation, 12(1), 22–32. https://doi.org/10.22495/jgrv12i1art2
Xu, G. J., Yang, C., & Fukofuka, P. T. (2023). Professional Skepticism in Practice: An Analysis of Auditors’ Stories. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 42(4), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.2308/AJPT-2021-043
